PDA

View Full Version : Intel demos Quad-Core Clovertown


Sandman
04-15-2006, 04:38 PM
Intel corporation has showcased a Clovertown prototype at its developer forum Taipei, Taiwan. Running at 2.0GHz, the chip has two dies, each containing two cores and 4MB of unified L2 cache, for a total of 4 execution cores and 8MB L2 cache.

The chips will be manufactured using a 65nm process size and are scheduled to begin shipping to computer manufacturers late this year, hitting the market early 2007.[---] Intel had showcased Clovertown prototypes earlier this year, but did not reveal any details concerning the architecture at that time.

The Cinebench numbers for Clovertown are also very impressive, with the four core beast achieving a score of 1723. The same chip, with only one core enabled, scored 362. The chip is not meant to be run in multiprocessor motherboards with more than 2 sockets, but Intel is working on a similar CPU, Tigerton, which will support 4 and 8 processor configurations.

Source: X-bit (http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/cpu/display/20060415072338.html) and ZDnet (http://news.zdnet.co.uk/hardware/chips/0,39020354,39252114,00.htm)

ktr
04-15-2006, 06:09 PM
Quad core??? Jesus, there is very little to no OS or Software that utilizes dualcore. Hardware is really surpassing software by a land side. All the latest and greatest tech of today is useless to the latest and greatest software of today.

AMDCam
04-15-2006, 06:57 PM
Yeah but when HAS software been ahead of hardware man? Plus I'm pretty sure most software will be multi-threaded, not dual-threaded, so it's up to the processor to decide if it should use 1 or 4 cores on an application. You know, like the game won't feed 2 seperate threads to a dual-core, I think it'll just throw out a bunch of seperate ones.

I have to say as far as core names though, Clovertown in no way sounds cool but it's the cleverest one I've ever heard of. I mean it actually RELATES to the cpu

Sandman
04-16-2006, 01:12 AM
Generally, hardware has to exist to have software build around it. Besides, it's not like this targets the enthusiast. It's for busy servers, which will use the horsepower it has to offer, even without multithreaded apps. Think about it. Which is cheaper, four xeons, or one of these?

Solaris17
04-16-2006, 01:51 AM
sparc came out with 8 cores a while back

POGE
04-16-2006, 01:55 AM
sparc came out with 8 cores a while back
Yeah, and each one had 4 threads per core, for a total of 32 threads! :eek:

Solaris17
04-16-2006, 02:30 AM
are you being sarcastic?

POGE
04-16-2006, 02:34 AM
Nope.
http://gii.nagaokaut.ac.jp/gii/media/23/20051209-Sun_UltraSPARC_T1.png
Each UltraSPARK core has 4 threads.

AMDCam
04-16-2006, 03:44 AM
What the hell is Sparc?

Steevo
04-16-2006, 04:00 AM
Mainframe Processor. Large scale SMP stacks if you prefer. Imagine putting 2 or 4U racks togeather that each house four multicore CPU's per board, then using Fibrechannel to link them together, and each having 16Gb of RAM per Unit. Stack about 8-10 units per tower and you have a small computer.

:drool:

I wish I cold bench our AS/400, not that it would relate to how a PC benchmark is though.

FLY3R
04-16-2006, 04:25 AM
:eek: :eek: :eek: Those things are going to :rockout: