View Full Version : power pwr difference: brisbane 4800 stock vs +300mhz oc'ed
slothy_punk
11-22-2007, 05:56 PM
Just curious to know :)
Mad_Man
11-22-2007, 06:25 PM
((oc_volts/stock_volts)^2)*(oc_freq/stock_freq)*TDP=aproximated TDP after OC.
Thats TDP only, since we dont exactly know power consumption of each individual chip.
and its cpu only, some more power will go to ram/chipset, but thats really a ... 2W more.
slothy_punk
11-22-2007, 06:27 PM
((oc_volts/stock_volts)^2)*(oc_freq/stock_freq)*TDP=aproximated TDP after OC.
Thats TDP only, since we dont exactly know power consumption of each individual chip.
and its cpu only, some more power will go to ram/chopset, but thats really a ... 2W more.
Anyway.. thanks for those equations :)
JC316
11-22-2007, 07:29 PM
As for processing power, you should see a decent jump in performance, especially if you have a powerful video card.
slothy_punk
11-24-2007, 02:48 AM
Virtually zero.
??? No..... more speed(by overclocked) means more performance + energy spent, keep in mind more performance is linear to power needed ^^, or power by 2
slothy_punk
11-24-2007, 02:49 AM
As for processing power, you should see a decent jump in performance, especially if you have a powerful video card.
i dont mean by processing power, wat i mean in this thread here is power, as energy needed to run overclocked processor vs the default speed
vBulletin® v3.7.0, Copyright ©2000-2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.