New 3dmark05 Compilation.

[JC316]

Well, since PT is a lazy bastard and won't update his, I am starting a new one. Rather than sort through all of his backlogs, just post new ones. ORB, or Pic with CPU and GPU Z clock please.


ATi Scores - Single Card Setup's

giorgos_th. HD2900XT @ 887/1017 30,054- QX9650@ 5.5GHZ
Mediocre HD2900XT@ 818/1153 22,725- Q6600@ 3.95GHZ
JC316 HD2900XT @ 832/916 20,004- E4300@ 3.5GHZ
ghost101 HD3850@769/999....... 19,840 - E6300@ 3.64GHZ
Sneekypeet HD3870 @ 775/1125 18,457 E6300@ 3.04GHZ
Oliver_FF HD3870 @ Stock 17,949- E6600@ 3GHZ
Kursah 1950XTX @ 695/1035 14,089- E6300@ 3.5GHZ
Mad-Matt HD3870 @ 860/1250 13,888- Athlon X2 3800+@ 2.6GHZ
AthlonX2 HD2600XT @ ?/1102 11,437- Athlon X2 3800+ @ 3.05GHZ
Imperialign X1950Pro x-fire@ 608/729 9,752 Pentium 524@ 4.26GHZ





ATi Scores - X-Fire Setup's


nVidia Scores - Single Card Setup's

strick94u 8800GTS 512MB @747/104519,869 - E6600@3.34GHZ
OrbitzXT 8800GT @ 691/950 17,586- Q6600@ 3.3GHZ
pbmaster 8800GTS 640MB @ 701/1003 17,443- Athlon X2 6000@ 3.3GHZ
Hat 8500GT @ 650/425 5,166- Athlon X2 5200 @ 2.75GHZ
cdawall FX5700@ 521/720 736 - Pentium D 930@ 3.1GHZ


nVidia Scores - SLI Setup's

[intel igent]

how many of these are there now?

4?

[AthlonX2]

i dont see no proof that you got 20,008 in 05...if you want us to rerun the benchies shouldnt you post link to your verification also

[Kursah]

JC, not dissin ya or anything, but where's your post of results w/screenies and verifacations? Your sig shows 20,004 you posted 20,008. Granted only 4pts, you should set example for the other users you want to follow. I'll be posting my results shortly...been a while since I ran 3dm 05, figured I might as well see what I can score now compared to my old screens. Also, dig the layout.

:toast:

[JC316]

i dont see no proof that you got 20,008 in 05...if you want us to rerun the benchies shouldnt you post link to your verification also

DOH!, I knew I missed something. Yeah yeah, I know, I fucked it up lol. We only have one that hasn't been updated since october because PT is lazy. I will keep this one updated.

[Kursah]

Very nice score, I pulled off 14k with my setup w/oc'd x1950xtx. The reason why GPU-Z is detecting my OC'd clocks (this also works with CCC from my testings) is due to a custom bios I made that has custom clocks, custom bios, but no matter what I did to the fan settings, they wouldn't cooperate, so I use ATI Tool for that.

I'm sure you'll take care of this thread just fine JC, just had to flip ya a little crap! :D

Here ya go:

[DaMulta]

Please add one more list with everyone in it:)

Call it a master list if you must.

[hat]

I guess I can manage running a benchmark...
does it matter if my system is stable? I know for a fact the GPU is, but I'm running some different RAM, HT, FSB, and CPU settings right now..

[AthlonX2]

heres mines jc

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=3583872

[OrbitzXT]

http://img.techpowerup.org/071125/3d05.jpg

[OrbitzXT]

Gah how do I do the attachment thumbnail thing like the rest of you did lol?

[hat]

http://www.techpowerup.org

[Oliver_FF]

17,949 in 3DMark05 - HD3870XT STOCK CLOCKS

http://service.futuremark.com/orb/resultanalyzer.jsp?projectType=12&XLID=0&UID=12147007

[Mad-Matt]

13888 - 3800X2 @ 2.6ghz - Radeon 3870 OC (860/1250)

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=3704686

[hat]

Here's mine. The only thing not included in the pic is that I'm running Windows XP Professional x64.

[Morgoth]

hey would you also add the cpu types to the scorelist?

[OrbitzXT]

Isn't 05 kind of pointless for anyone with a next generation card? It's all dependent how high you can clock your CPU, and dual cores will outperform quads in this test.

[Kursah]

Isn't 05 kind of pointless for anyone with a next generation card? It's all dependent how high you can clock your CPU, and dual cores will outperform quads in this test.

There's still some dependency on GPU, I mean otherwise JC and his 2900 and e4300 @ 3.5 wouldn't have stomped my x1950xtx and e6300 @ 3.5 right? Sure it's only 6k points, but kind of interesting to see what the new cards are pulling off in an older bench. Interesting to see 8800GTs and 38xx's within a few thousand of my score. And I know it's true that the CPU plays a big role in 05, but 3d power is still relevent imo.

:toast:

[OrbitzXT]

Well like I said, next generation cards. Your card is outdated compared with the latest stuff. My point is though that JC gets a higher score than me in 05 because his dual core can clock higher than my quad, but in 06 where it matters less I get a higher score.

[Mediocre]

CCC 818 core and 1153 memory
http://img.techpowerup.org/071125/3dmark05-3.95-44412.jpg
http://service.futuremark.com/orb/resultanalyzer.jsp?projectType=12&XLID=0&UID=12301888

[Kursah]

Orbit, you're G0 can't hit 3.5? I never looked too far into those, but I have read here and there that those are "supposed" to hit 3.6+ easily...but no two G0's are exactlly the same either, granted technology is more consistant now.

So you think you'd score the same or better if you could get that extra 200mhz?

[pt]

i will ask a mod to close the other thread, and going to give jc the updated score list of the other thread :)

[JC316]

hey would you also add the cpu types to the scorelist?

Sure, i will add that real quick.

[giorgos th.]

QX9650 @ 5507 on LN2 - single 2900XT 512mb @ 887/1017 on stock air.

30054 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=3794892)

[cdawall]

FX5700 @521/720 PD 930@3.1ghz

http://hwbot.org/signature.img?iid=36215&thumb=false

if its good enough for hwbot should be good enough for you ;) sry gpuz didnt exist at the time of the run :roll:

[sneekypeet]

http://service.futuremark.com/orb/resultanalyzer.jsp?projectType=12&XLID=0&UID=12364142


My contribution. This is the highest Ive ever been in a 3D05 list.....wont last long tho...lol

[strick94u]

http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b389/strick94u/run2.jpg

[imperialreign]

Pentium 4 524 @ 4.26GHz
2 ATI X1950 PRO 608/729 in xFire

http://img214.imageshack.us/img214/5572/3m05gm8.th.jpg (http://img214.imageshack.us/my.php?image=3m05gm8.jpg)

dang! almost broke 10k!

for single card setup:

http://www.hwbot.org/listResults.do?userId=12313&applicationId=5

[pbmaster]

Here we are.

http://i105.photobucket.com/albums/m233/pbmaster_2006/05_17k.jpg

[JC316]

updated.

[giorgos th.]

CF baby..............:laugh::laugh:
35342 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=3821841) - QX9650 @ 5507mhz - dual 2900XT 512mb @ 850/990 - LN2/stock air

[imperialreign]

updated.



just to let you know . . . my score on the list is wrong. The 9k score from my screenie is a xFire setup. The link I posted under it, which is an 8k score, is for a single card score that I submitted to hwbot.


and that puts me at the bottom of the ATI lists - damn Pentium 4!!!

[Mediocre]

Update, its cold out:p
HD2900PRO1GB@ 822/1000 23,226- Q6600@ 4.08GHZ
http://img.techpowerup.org/080102/05-23226-Vista662.jpg
Could you change it to a 2900PRO1GB as well :) :rockout:
http://service.futuremark.com/orb/resultanalyzer.jsp?projectType=12&XLID=0&UID=13132517