wPrime 1.58 , What is your score ?

[trickson]

I have seen many use this benchmark and well I thought that I would start a thread on it and see how we all stack up .
So far I have been able to get 3.9Ghz stable with 1.6Vcore . well here is my score .

http://img155.imageshack.us/img155/4997/wprime39ghzwi9.jpg

I hope you all will participate in this . :rockout:

[trog100]

link

http://www.wprime.net/download.html?q=wprime_158.zip

trog

[trog100]

http://www.cavecom.com/pics/wprime.jpg

trog

ps.. it seems to have got the clock speed wrong and i wish the vcore really was what it says.. he he

[trickson]

Yeah I see that too . ^^ .

[trog100]

mine was at 3.8.. yours would be slightly in front being at 3.9.. both very similar thow.. we are missing a higher multiplier.. the chips would go way higher its the x 8 multiplier causing the problems up near the 4 gig mark..

trog

[trickson]

mine was at 3.8.. yours would be slightly in front being at 3.9.. both very similar thow.. we are missing a higher multiplier.. the chips would go way higher its the x 8 multiplier causing the problems up near the 4 gig mark..

trog

Yes I can get to 4 Ghz But there is a performance fall off at that speed .

[mandelore]

http://img.techpowerup.org/071223/wprime.jpg

:roll:

[Morgoth]

it says i cheated!

[trickson]

it says i cheated!

Then stop cheating !

[cdawall]

i will run this after i pick up the mobo/cooler im bidding on ebay for check syspecs for what they are :D

[Morgoth]

Then stop cheating !

i did not i runned second test after 80% it says i cheated.. and stopts

[trickson]

i did not i runned second test after 80% it says i cheated.. and stopts

Well that is new . wounder why it is doing that . :confused:

[Widjaja]

I get different scores depending where I open wPrime from.
I opened it up from one of my Folders in desktop and the 32M benchmark dropped from 38 to 45.

[DanTheBanjoman]

1024M - 291s 360ms (http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=648312)
32M - 9s 590ms (http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=648306)

At only 2.3GHz. Some day in the future I'll replace my board with Seaburg and clock them higher.

[theonetruewill]

1024M - 291s 360ms (http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=648312)
32M - 9s 590ms (http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=648306)

At only 2.3GHz. Some day in the future I'll replace my board with Seaburg and clock them higher.
Holy...:eek:

[wwwww]

it says i cheated!

Did you run it through midnight? 'cause your clock is going to go back during then and it's going to think that you're pushing it back to get a better score (introduced this around v1.3 to stop negative scores). :P

[cdawall]

1024M - 291s 360ms (http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=648312)
32M - 9s 590ms (http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=648306)

At only 2.3GHz. Some day in the future I'll replace my board with Seaburg and clock them higher.

uh oh dan your catching up with me in hwbot points now! time to do some benching :roll:

[DaMulta]

http://img.techpowerup.org/071226/prime.jpg

[DanTheBanjoman]

uh oh dan your catching up with me in hwbot points now! time to do some benching :roll:

Catching up? Look at the dates I entered them. It's not likely I'm adding any.

[technicks]

http://img.techpowerup.org/071226/Capture022.jpg

:D

[cdawall]

Catching up? Look at the dates I entered them. It's not likely I'm adding any.

o ha thats what i get for not reading :banghead:

[Mad_Man]

http://www.madbyte.sk/hwbot/1-1.jpg
my two cents.
it looks on par with that kentsfield at 3600mhz if you divide my score with 2 (4cores vs 2)

also i got 734sec on 1024one, at 3418mhz

[DanTheBanjoman]

http://www.madbyte.sk/hwbot/1-1.jpg
my two cents.
it looks on par with that kentsfield at 3600mhz if you divide my score with 2 (4cores vs 2)

also i got 734sec on 1024one, at 3418mhz

wPrime scores pretty well across with multiple cores. That's what makes it a nice benchmark. ie I'm not limited by crap memory bandwidth or other things.

[sorehammer]

here's mine at stock