View Full Version : Server 2008 Wow!
flashstar
03-02-2008, 08:06 PM
I'm trying out the trial for Server 2008 and I just can't believe how fast it is. I got the 32 bit version installed and it actually is quicker than a stock XP installation. It takes about 25 seconds to boot up and around 8 to shut down without tweaking it at all. I've also gotten both the X-fi drivers and Catalyst drivers installed without issue. I'll try running 3dmark06 to see if there is a performance hit like Vista.
I'll add more updates soon.
cdawall
03-02-2008, 08:16 PM
i already made a thread on this a while ago
http://forums.techpowerup.com/showthread.php?t=47994&highlight=PRO+server
flashstar
03-02-2008, 08:18 PM
This is the final version from MS that I'm testing.
DanTheBanjoman
03-02-2008, 08:37 PM
Does it include DX10 and the likes? Any problems with drivers? I take it it uses the same as Vista?
flashstar
03-02-2008, 08:39 PM
It includes DX10, aero, etc. The only thing that it doesn't have is Media Center it appears. I haven't had problems with any drivers. I've been using Vista drivers.
cdawall
03-02-2008, 08:39 PM
Does it include DX10 and the likes? Any problems with drivers? I take it it uses the same as Vista?
it uses the same drivers but i had some issues (in the beta) with the 64bit drivers and my card but its an old 7800GS so that could just be me
lemonadesoda
03-02-2008, 09:00 PM
The speed isnt any faster than a fresh install of Windows 2003, FYI. That's why so many enthusiasts get the server editions to run as desktops. No bloat. more efficient kernel, esp. multithreading.
flashstar
03-02-2008, 09:02 PM
I've found that it indeed runs faster than a fresh install of 2003. Not as much as compared to XP, but still probably 10% faster.
Edit: I got 8269 points on 3dmark06. The scores in my sig are after my video card was overclocked, so this as a non-overclocked score isn't too bad.
erocker
03-02-2008, 09:10 PM
Not bad at all! By the numbers it almost seems as if it's faster than XP! Is there any way a schlub like me could try Server 2008?:D
lemonadesoda
03-02-2008, 09:11 PM
OK, interesting. Keep us informed with software compatibility etc.
DanTheBanjoman
03-02-2008, 09:43 PM
The speed isnt any faster than a fresh install of Windows 2003, FYI. That's why so many enthusiasts get the server editions to run as desktops. No bloat. more efficient kernel, esp. multithreading.
Well, I was thinking of Vista due to PAE slowing down memory and I already lack bandwidth there. Could be a good move to go for 2008 instead if it doesn't offer any additional issues.
flashstar
03-03-2008, 12:17 AM
If you can afford it, go with 2008. I installed several more programs like Photoshop, Office, Xfire, and Steam without any issues. All run just as well or better than they do on windows XP. When I load Office, I don't even see the loading screen, it just opens right up.
psyko12
03-03-2008, 07:19 AM
Wow, good find, better check commonly used apps/games etc and see if it makes good diff.
beyond_amusia
03-03-2008, 10:20 AM
Dang... I used to use Server 2k3 until I got an iPod; After my iPod died I went x64... Looks like I might need to concider 2k8 now. :)
InnocentCriminal
03-03-2008, 10:30 AM
60 Day free trail, not bad. I've been planning on reformatting since November last year, I might as well bite the bullet and try this out as well. I've been meaning to use a 64bit OS for a while. Wonder if it'll give the Code 43 error.
vBulletin® v3.7.0, Copyright ©2000-2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.