Crysis Benchmarks!!!

[CrackerJack]

Crysis Benchmarks!!!
Rules- Resolution 1280x1024
Post a screen shot!!! With a GPU-Z!!!
It will help alot if you tell me if your running crossfire or sli.
GPU-Z in Vista x64 doesn't show if crossfire or sli is being used.
Tweaks, can be used.
If your score is wrong or in the wrong place, please let me know!
Crysis Benchmark Results


DirectX 9


Low--
niko084- HD3850 119.94fps
JrRacinFan- 2600 PRO 50.37fps- Crossfire

Medium--
niko084- HD 3850 65.33fps
batmang- HD 3870 56.46fps- Crossfire
oli_ramsay- 8800gt 42.66fps
CrackerJack- 2900gt 41.06fps
JrRacinFan- 2600 PRO 24.30fps- Crossfire


High--
largon- 8800gts 55.00fps
Dr.Spankenstein- HD 3870 48.71fps- Crossfire
Black Panther- 8800 GT 45.08fps
kenkickr- HD 3870 43.75fps
batmang- HD 3870 38.735fps- Crossfire
Dr.Spankenstein- HD 3870 34.17fps
niko084- HD3850 29.63fps
oli_ramsay- 8800gt 28.07fps
EastCoasthandle- 2900xt 43.07fps
JrRacinFan- 2600 PRO 12.33fps- Crossfire

Very High--
EastCoasthandle- 2900xt 28.69fps
CrackerJack- 2900gt 17.97fps


---------------------------
DirectX 10


Low--



Medium--



High--
kenkickr- HD 3870 33.22fps
Dr.Spankenstein- HD 3870 29.64fps
oli_ramsay- 8800gt 18.52fps



Very High--
largon- 8800gts 26.00fps
CrackerJack- 2900gt 9.12fps


---------------

[oli_ramsay]

Here's mine for comparison:

High DX9

http://img.techpowerup.org/080412/cry.jpg

Medium DX9:

http://img.techpowerup.org/080412/cry2.jpg

High DX10 (10 fps less :eek:)

http://img.techpowerup.org/080412/cry3.jpg

[CrackerJack]

WOW 10fps more. Just went up to 3ghz and disable crossfire in ccc. wierd!
http://img.techpowerup.org/080413/Crysis BM 2.jpg

[3870x2]

I wonder what the record for very high is...

[lemonadesoda]

... I dont think the benchmark has completed yet. LOL

[jbunch07]

I wonder what the record for very high is...

1fps :laugh:

[jbunch07]

http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/showthread.php?t=17858884

Not the record, but still.

9800gx2 in trisli probably has the record.

you cant do tri sli with the gx2?? :confused:
only the gtx

[ShadowFold]

I will post some when I get home I am at school right now :laugh: the firewall doesnt block this site.. yet.

[CrackerJack]

Very High, 1280x1024 (the highest i can go), x64, DX9. :rockout:

http://img.techpowerup.org/080415/Crysis BM VISTAX64 1.jpg

[ShadowFold]

Wait I forgot im still on a HD 3450 :p I cant get it to run on low settings.. I will when I get my 3850 back.

[CrackerJack]

Wait I forgot im still on a HD 3450 :p I cant get it to run on low settings.. I will when I get my 3850 back.

you can't run at low settings?!? :wtf:

[cdawall]

subscribed ill run it on my 7800GS and the my xfired 3850s :D

[EastCoasthandle]

The results below are taken using DX9. I followed the same guidelines offered by forum developers to change High to Very High

http://i11.photobucket.com/albums/a154/eastcoasthandle/In%20game%20benchmark/SunRise_High.png
High


http://i11.photobucket.com/albums/a154/eastcoasthandle/In%20game%20benchmark/SunRise_VeryHigh.png
Very High


http://i11.photobucket.com/albums/a154/eastcoasthandle/In%20game%20benchmark/OceanView_High.png
High


http://i11.photobucket.com/albums/a154/eastcoasthandle/In%20game%20benchmark/OceanView_VeryHigh.png
Very High


http://i11.photobucket.com/albums/a154/eastcoasthandle/In%20game%20benchmark/Crysis_BM_High_Cat83.jpg
Results using High
38.023 at stock clocks
43.076 at 858/900

http://i11.photobucket.com/albums/a154/eastcoasthandle/In%20game%20benchmark/Crysis_BM_Veryhigh_Cat83.jpg
Results using Very High 858/900

[Dr. Spankenstein]

I can only submit the results I got back in Jan. on the first post of this (http://forums.techpowerup.com/showthread.php?t=51219) thread.;)

This might help you out CrackerJack....

[CrackerJack]

I can only submit the results I got back in Jan. on the first post of this (http://forums.techpowerup.com/showthread.php?t=51219) thread.;)

This might help you out CrackerJack....

let's see them. I'm still waiting on ati to release the crossfire drivers for my card. they should be in the 8.4 or 8.5 suite :ohwell:

[Dr. Spankenstein]

Since you didn't feel like clicking the link, it breaks down like this:

All FPS are for 1280X1024 "High" settings

XP: Single card-34.17, CF-45.81
Vista: Single card-33.27, CF 48.71 for DX9
Single card-27.1, CF 29.64 for DX10

Screenshots available through link.

[CrackerJack]

Since you didn't feel like clicking the link, it breaks down like this:

All FPS are for 1280X1024 "High" settings
XP: Single card-34.17, CF-45.81
Vista: Single card-33.27, CF 48.71 for DX9
Single card-27.1, CF 29.64 for DX10

Screenshots available through link.

Oh sorry man, i thought you were talking about different scores. I remeber those scores, i was thinking you had some newer ones :o

[Dr. Spankenstein]

No prob. Sorry if I wasn't clear when I said "..back in Jan.":laugh:

:toast:

[CrackerJack]

No prob. Sorry if I wasn't clear when I said "..back in Jan.":laugh:

:toast:

did you get better results with 8.2, i just notice you were using 8.1?

[Dr. Spankenstein]

I really haven't been recording my result since the 8.2 and 8.3 have done nothing bu give me "the shits"! Read poor fitseries3's thread about "Can't uninstall CCC"...

[EviLZeD]

highest fps i seen in crysis on very high is this
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QGqEp9irDuE

[CrackerJack]

I really haven't been recording my result since the 8.2 and 8.3 have done nothing bu give me "the shits"! Read poor fitseries3's thread about "Can't uninstall CCC"...

yeah i just see that, poor guy. i had the same problem a few days ago. but it's all good now :D

[CrackerJack]

highest fps i seen in crysis on very high is this
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QGqEp9irDuE

dude that's INSANE

[EastCoasthandle]

dude that's INSANE

You do notice it slowing down when it get's the that mountain top where that red/white metal tower is (blinking red light). :shadedshu

[Dr. Spankenstein]

That's where mine chugs the most...

For those that can't access YouTube @ work, what was the hubbub about the vid?

[jbunch07]

That's where mine chugs the most...

For those that can't access YouTube @ work, what was the hubbub about the vid?

he got 60fps average
and 80 max

[EastCoasthandle]

BUT he had a low of 15.XX FPS which IMO defeats the purpose. Had his lowest score been within the ball park of a few FPS it would have been impressive indeed. However, if you look at the video you can clearly see were the benchmark slows down and it's not as smooth as it should be. It was like driving at the top end of 3rd gear then all of a sudden you get shift shocked in 1st gear.

[jbunch07]

BUT he had a low of 15.XX FPS which IMO defeats the purpose. Had his lowest score been within the ball park of a few FPS it would have been impressive indeed. However, if you look at the video you can clearly see were the benchmark slows down and it's not as smooth as it should be. It was like driving at the top end of 3rd gear then all of a sudden you get shift shocked in 1st gear.

haha yea i noticed that as well...good comparison...it was sluggish like a wet sponge lol

[CrackerJack]

Here's with the new 8.4 drivers, but still no crossfire support yet with this suite. Loss a few fps! :(
http://img.techpowerup.org/080416/Crysis BM VISTAX64 8.4.jpg

[EastCoasthandle]

Go back :shadedshu

[DaedalusHelios]

http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/showthread.php?t=17858884

Not the record, but still.

9800gx2 in trisli probably has the record.

You mean quad Sli. :laugh:

No drivers scale 6 gpus.:laugh:

One 9800Gx2 OC'ed does 25fps to 40fps on average with an OC'ed quad in very high at 1600x1200. But some settings have to be tweaked. ;)

From my personal experience on my gaming rig. ;)

[CrackerJack]

Yeh, but he's using Vista and hasnt mentioned any cfg file tweaks.

Alright i do it with dx10, plus i'm not using any tweaks.

[EastCoasthandle]

I see...well then, if only he tried XP for this with the DX10 adjustments...works wonders I tell you, wonders...

[CrackerJack]

I see...well then, if only he tried XP for this with the DX10 adjustments...works wonders I tell you, wonders...

is there any tweaks though for vista

[EastCoasthandle]

not that I know of. Remember this is DX9 game made for DX10

[CrackerJack]

not that I know of. Remember this is DX9 game made for DX10

yeah, i can only play in dx9 for right now. I haven't tried with the new drivers. but with dx10 is choppy really really bad.

[CrackerJack]

DX10
1280x1024
Very High
Single Card
8.4 CCC
(9.12fps) :ohwell:
http://img.techpowerup.org/080416/Crysis BM VISTAX64 8.4 VH DX10.jpg

[jbunch07]

https://a248.e.akamai.net/f/674/9206/0/www2.ati.com/gamesite/Catalyst_84_release_notes.html
this might have something to do with it?

[DaedalusHelios]

https://a248.e.akamai.net/f/674/9206/0/www2.ati.com/gamesite/Catalyst_84_release_notes.html
this might have something to do with it?

That link is bad lol.

[jbunch07]

That link is bad lol.

works for me

[jbunch07]

Yeh, but at least the graphics at very high are breathtaking. Its a huge step up from high. The foliage, water and lighting is so much better.

i wish ATi cards ran cysis as well as the new nvidia cards...:shadedshu

[CrackerJack]

Yeh, but at least the graphics at very high are breathtaking. Its a huge step up from high. The foliage, water and lighting is so much better.

yeah it looks really awesome, when i play. i play at medium settings with dx9 and 1280x1024. Just till my drivers are release. I'll run it high then. High runs pretty smooth now. But i want more!! lol

[largon]

8800GTS 512MB
864MHz / 2268MHz / 1053MHz (DDR-2106)
^gaming stable settings

DX9 High 1280x1024:
34fps min
55fps average
66fps max
http://img.techpowerup.org/080417/DX9_H_SXGA.png

DX10 Very High 1280x1024:
19fps min
26fps average
35fps max
http://img.techpowerup.org/080417/DX10_VH_SXGA.png

DX9 Custom CVAR (>> Very High) 1280x1024:
33fps min
45fps average
57fps max
http://img.techpowerup.org/080417/DX9_C_SXGA.png

[choppy]

how do i run this benchmark~?

[marsey99]

http://img509.imageshack.us/img509/959/76215916mm0.jpg

thats mine from a whle back running the same settings as the guys over at xs had.

http://forums.techpowerup.com/showthread.php?t=51981&highlight=crysis+benchmark
heres the thread i started about it, glad this 1 gets more attention as it was very lonley in mine :D

[niko084]

The benchmark started at 4/17/2008 8:43:49 AM

System Information
Operating system: Microsoft Windows XP
System memory: 2.0 GB
CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E6750 @ 2.66GHz
CPU speed: 3200 MHz
Sound system: SB Audigy 2 ZS Audio [CF00]
VGA Information
Graphics card: ATI Radeon HD 3850
Memory: 256.0 MB
Driver version: 6.14.0010.6783 (English)

VGA benchmark
Demo: Crytek Built-in
Quality: High
Renderer mode: DirectX 9
Antialising mode: Off
Filtering mode: None
MultiGPU support: Disabled
Boost renderer: Disabled
Use Custom Config File: No

Resolution: 1280×1024
Result(1): Minimum= 17.79 FPS Average= 25.26 FPS Max= 34.26 FPS

Running very high now

[niko084]

The benchmark started at 4/17/2008 8:52:19 AM

System Information
Operating system: Microsoft Windows XP
System memory: 2.0 GB
CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E6750 @ 2.66GHz
CPU speed: 3200 MHz
Sound system: SB Audigy 2 ZS Audio [CF00]
VGA Information
Graphics card: ATI Radeon HD 3850
Memory: 256.0 MB
Driver version: 6.14.0010.6783 (English)

VGA benchmark
Demo: Crytek Built-in
Quality: Very High (with tweaks)
Renderer mode: DirectX 9
Antialising mode: Off
Filtering mode: None
MultiGPU support: Disabled
Boost renderer: Disabled
Use Custom Config File: No

Resolution: 1280×1024
Result(1): Minimum= 11.76 FPS Average= 15.73 FPS Max= 19.55 FPS

Sad I get better fps very high in vista.....

[jbunch07]

im going to install cysis when i get home and give it a run it should be very funny with just 1 8600gts lol

[niko084]

Decided to run the same program you guys were using... So here it is.
http://img.techpowerup.org/080417/crybench.jpg
29.63 High 1280x1024
65.33 Medium 1280x1024
119.945 Low 1280x1024

I play single player on High or Very High and play multi player on medium for obvious reasons.

[largon]

marsey99,
Your run is at 1024x768 so it's not exactly comparable to other result in this thread.

[CrackerJack]

yeah man, do this test in 1280x1024.

thanks for the results

[largon]

IMO, DX10 Very High is nothing impressive. Performance takes a huge hit and level of detail (LOD) doesn't increase significantly. You can get much better LOD and fps by using custom configured CVAR-files:
Here (http://www.helsinki.fi/~llounent/crysis_comparison.html)'s a crude comparison I put together to demonstrate how custom configs affect level of detail and image quality:
1. DX9 all on "High"
2. DX10 all on "High"
3. DX10 all on "Very High"
4. DX9 all on "High" with Taowolf's custom autoexec.cfg and CVAR folder (single player only)
5. DX9 all on "High" with Taowolf's custom autoexec.cfg (punkbuster compliant)

edit:
DX10 "Very High" vs custom config (http://www.helsinki.fi/~llounent/crysis_comparison_dx10_vs_cc.html) is especially interesting...

[jbunch07]

ok i got crysis installed and the becnhmark tool installed can somone tell me how to run this thing when i click begin bench it just starts the game like i was going to play it. how do i set up a run like was in the video?

[CrackerJack]

ok i got crysis installed and the becnhmark tool installed can somone tell me how to run this thing when i click begin bench it just starts the game like i was going to play it. how do i set up a run like was in the video?

Check the pic

[jbunch07]

umm...do have to run at very high i think my 8600gts is going to pop if i try that?

[jbunch07]

http://img.techpowerup.org/080418/crysisbench.jpg
now i just hit run benchmark correct?

[CrackerJack]

http://img.techpowerup.org/080418/crysisbench.jpg
now i just hit run benchmark correct?

yeah, if your going very high. do it in dx10. What your results at dx9 and High settings

[jbunch07]

http://img.techpowerup.org/080418/crysisbench2.jpg
http://img.techpowerup.org/080418/crysisbench3.jpg
something is still not working right...when i hit run benchmark it runs the game and just displays the stats...?

[Dr. Spankenstein]

Do you have any game saves?

[jbunch07]

ive beat the game so i should

[Dr. Spankenstein]

Sorry, I just remember that happening before I had played the game and made a save.

That's all...:(


Maybe there is an autoconfig you need to hide in order to work?

[jbunch07]

so wait i cant run this benchmark because its saved?

[Dr. Spankenstein]

No, that's not what I'm saying.

But there is something that is keeping it from loading the timedemos that the benchmark uses, that's why I mentioned the autoconfig.

Someone else please chime in if they can run the bechmark while still using a modded autoconfig.cfg file.

[jbunch07]

No, that's not what I'm saying.

But there is something that is keeping it from loading the timedemos that the benchmark uses, that's why I mentioned the autoconfig.

Someone else please chime in if they can run the bechmark while still using a modded autoconfig.cfg file.

yes please do i would like to run this bench

[CrackerJack]

yes please do i would like to run this bench

I guess i could upload mine, but it will be alittle bit before i can. Dr. might be able to do it though.

[Dr. Spankenstein]

Oh, we weren't asking for the file. My thought is that if jbunch07 has a modded autoexec.cfg it might be bypassing the custom timedemos the benchmark uses.

Just move it out of the folder to the desktop and try to run again.

[CrackerJack]

Oh, we weren't asking for the file. My thought is that if jbunch07 has a modded autoexec.cfg it might be bypassing the custom timedemos the benchmark uses.

Just move it out of the folder to the desktop and try to run again.

just wonder, where would the autoexec.cfg file be at. I don't even see un modd file on my system

[kenkickr]

Here's mine. One is DX9, 64bit and the other is DX10 64bit.

[batmang]

I dont have my latest results, but heres the most up to date one I have:
http://www.jmbat.com/media/phenomoc/crysis_xp64_2point5.JPG
Crysis 1.2 with all default configuration files.

With my CrossFire setup, I get 53FPS in Medium at 1680x1050 and 33FPS in HIGH at 1680x1050. DX9, I'm running WinXP64. I may not be running at 3.4+GHz but look at the result. Not bad for a Phenom 9600 and a single 3870. :)

[CrackerJack]

I dont have my latest results, but heres the most up to date one I have:
http://www.jmbat.com/media/phenomoc/crysis_xp64_2point5.JPG
Crysis 1.2 with all default configuration files.

With my CrossFire setup, I get 53FPS in Medium at 1680x1050 and 33FPS in HIGH at 1680x1050. DX9, I'm running WinXP64. I may not be running at 3.4+GHz but look at the result. Not bad for a Phenom 9600 and a single 3870. :)

nice scores, but we are using 1280x1024. I like to see what you get with that resolution. :D

[batmang]

Ah, I will report back tonight for sure.

[CrackerJack]

Please check first post, for rules and scores!!!!

[batmang]

EDIT:

Low, Medium, and High.
http://www.jmbat.com/media/phenomoc/Crysis_CrossFire_2point5_low_med_high_1280x1024.jp g
WinXP 64 - DX9

[JrRacinFan]

Where did you guys get the cool gui? All I see are the .bat's for benching.

[Dr. Spankenstein]

These are O L D but good for a comparison. I'll soon post results with 1GHz core.:D

XP: Single card and Crossfire scores
http://img.techpowerup.org/080131/SingleCFPatchXP.png

Vista (DX10): Single card

http://img.techpowerup.org/080131/SinglePatchDX10.png

Vista: (DX9 & DX 10) Crossfire

http://img.techpowerup.org/080131/CFPatchDX10DX9.png

[DaedalusHelios]

Once my Q6700 is underwater I will give you guys a bench of my 9800GX2. I am aiming for 4Ghz.

Whats the cheapest waterblock for a 9800GX2?

[choppy]

Where did you guys get the cool gui? All I see are the .bat's for benching.

for those guys that are clueless (like myself and JracinFan) go here to get the fancy gui stuff
http://crymod.com/thread.php?postid=80046

[marsey99]

its from xs originally i think??

[batmang]

Updated my post above with a low/medium/high result.

[largon]

It seems my DX9 High setting result (http://forums.techpowerup.com/showpost.php?p=753605&postcount=47) is misplaced in the list of DX10 High results in 1st post.
Also, marsey99's DX10 Very High result (http://forums.techpowerup.com/showpost.php?p=753631&postcount=49) is not 1280x1024 so no point in listing it as if it was comparable to other results.

Btw, what configs were used for the listed DX9 Very High results?

[Nitro-Max]

Anyone had any problems with this i ran it once and it screwed my crysis up from launching.

[Dr. Spankenstein]

It seems my DX9 High setting result (http://forums.techpowerup.com/showpost.php?p=753605&postcount=47) is misplaced in the list of DX10 High results in 1st post.
Also, marsey99's DX10 Very High result (http://forums.techpowerup.com/showpost.php?p=753631&postcount=49) is not 1280x1024 so no point in listing it as if it was comparable to other results.

Btw, what configs were used for the listed DX9 Very High results?


An excellent point! Mine were stock install configs. Anything less would be pointless to compare as anyone could tweak a "High" config to use only "Low" settings.

[CrackerJack]

I was using the stock configs also.

[jbunch07]

i still cant run the bench :mad:

[largon]

Setting "Very High" when DX9 is selected in the bench app the bench is run usin "High" setting.
That is, unless additional .cfg file / CVARs are used.

So I don't get it why people's score with DX9 "Very High" are so low...

[Dr. Spankenstein]

That is the rub. The CVARs had to have been tweaked to read "4" on some items in order for "Very High" to be an option in DX9.

Hardly considered "stock" and completely random for comparison purposes UNLESS someone posted a "Very High" tweaked config that everyone would use. But this isn't realistic, we should just go on honor and stock configs. A stock config could be posted so that everyone who had deleted/modified their original could run a standardized test.

[Black Panther]

Here is mine, using High settings Dx9 on XP SP3 32bit.

http://img.techpowerup.org/080530/DX9 High.jpg


Now I did the tweak to get very high "dx10" settings, here's the result:

http://img.techpowerup.org/080530/DX9 Very High.jpg

What a difference - the first test had average fps of 45 and now this one's 28.5! A difference of 16.5 fps! :wtf: :eek:

[ShadowFold]

i still cant run the bench :mad:

I cant either? I thought it was just me.. I launch it and it crashes.

[JrRacinFan]

http://img.techpowerup.org/080531/Capture109.jpg

http://img.techpowerup.org/080531/Capture110.jpg

[CrackerJack]

Updated!!

[cdawall]

http://img.techpowerup.org/080531/Capture017-20080531.png
xfire^
http://img.techpowerup.org/080531/Capture018-20080531.png
single card^