CPU Database

[W1zzard]

the CPU database can be found here: http://www.techpowerup.com/cpudb/

Feedback is welcome.

[Steven B]

all the 800fsb intel 500 series have a 501 counterpart

[Dippyskoodlez]

Its missing the georgetown and sonora semprons. I have a sonora :)

Also, possible to use multiple filters instead of having one filter apply when you select it only?

[djbbenn]

I'll add the 5X1/P4F's tonight, I only got up the the E's. Also got to get the J's in there. I'll work on the georgetown's and sonora later.

-Dan

[Thermopylae_480]

Perhaps add a column for 64-bit support? Don't forget Itanium:laugh: .

[djbbenn]

If you hold your mouse pointer over the cpu, it will popup with the features of the cpu's (doesn't seem to work on firefox though).

No point in addding Itanium's... I highly doubt anyone here will have one lol.

-Dan

[Thermopylae_480]

Hmm. No wonder I couldn't see it, I'm using firefox. I wonder why it doesn't work with Firefox?:confused: I'm sure someone has a high end Itanium. They are only like, $4000 U.S. a pop.;) and run 32-bit apps like crap.:p You might need one if you try to predict global climate changes in your spare time:D .

[djbbenn]

I don't think you can even use them for everyday use... they are specially designed for powerful enterprise server use with linux and windows server.

-Dan

[Thermopylae_480]

Sorry. I guess the sarcasim didn't get through.:laugh: I like the database though Dan; very handy.:respect:

[AMDCam]

W1zzard, you got a typo on the Toledo core. Thought I'd let you know. Thanks for everything you're doing in the hardware community dude.

[W1zzard]

W1zzard, you got a typo on the Toledo core. Thought I'd let you know. Thanks for everything you're doing in the hardware community dude.
fixed

[W1zzard]

Also, possible to use multiple filters instead of having one filter apply when you select it only?

done

[Migons]

If we are accurate, Claw Hammer --> ClawHammer, and Newcastle --> NewCastle.

And ClawHammer 3500+ (S939) is missing. Or actually it's ClawHammer-512.
http://koti.mbnet.fi/migons/content/images/a64/a64_3102mhz.png
http://koti.mbnet.fi/migons/content/images/a64/ada3500dep4as.jpg

Default Vcore is 1.5V and TDP 89W.

|EDIT| My friend reported me about his AXP 3200+, but it's using FSB333 and multiplier is x14. Default frequency is 2333MHz, and Vcore is 1.65V. But I have no idea about the TDP...
http://oksat.no-ip.org/~mikko/3200+.jpg

[W1zzard]

both fixed - we want to be accurate ;)

[Migons]

Athlon 64s have FSB of 200MHz, but Opterons have FSB of 1000MHz? A little misleading? Just put the FSB/HTT, not the HT Bus...

[djbbenn]

I changed it to HTT speed to 200 for all, and changed all the other athlons, xeon's, and pentium m's. And got W1zz to get all the opterons at 200MHz and update the P4's so they are not shown as quad-pumped.

-Dan

[Migons]

There could also be a seperate "Bus Speed" or something for A64s' HT Bus and P4s' Quad-Pumped Bus.

[Freddy2]

Hello all,

this is my first post here! :)
I just wanted to say that the Pentium 4 Extreme Editions at the top (two 3400 MHz ones and the 3466 MHz) are NOT Prescotts, but Northwood-2M (Gallatin) and do not have SSE3... unfortunately... :( ;)

Freddy

P.S.: The 3200 MHz PGA one is missing, by the way.

[KOLE]

There is one mistake:

Sempron 2800+ S754 has multiplier 8x and works on 1600MHz

[djbbenn]

Hello all,

this is my first post here! :)
I just wanted to say that the Pentium 4 Extreme Editions at the top (two 3400 MHz ones and the 3466 MHz) are NOT Prescotts, but Northwood-2M (Gallatin) and do not have SSE3... unfortunately... :( ;)

Freddy

P.S.: The 3200 MHz PGA one is missing, by the way.

Fixed.

There is one mistake:

Sempron 2800+ S754 has multiplier 8x and works on 1600MHz

Fixed.. thanks guys.

-Dan

[Urlyin]

Great Job Dan .... :toast:

[djbbenn]

Thanks :D

-Dan

[tony929292]

cool very useful just like everthingelse at tpu

[Solaris17]

wow this thing is wicked cool(yes wicked im from N.H.)

[shoman24v]

I have a Toledo core X2 3800+

[djbbenn]

Is it like partially disabled? Cache I mean...

-Dan

[shoman24v]

Is it like partially disabled? Cache I mean...

-Dan
Yes it's 512 cache is disabled but it's still a Toledo core, it's not a Manchester.

E6 Revision = Toledo
E4 Revision = Manchester

My 512kb Toledo http://img427.imageshack.us/my.php?image=cpuz4kf.jpg

1MB Toledo http://img240.imageshack.us/img240/4810/32m28135621za.jpg

True Manchester E4 Revision http://img370.imageshack.us/img370/8854/32m9fc.png

Toledo's have a bigger die then the Manchesters.

[djbbenn]

I don't think it will be put in, can cause to much confusion. It's still showed as a Manchester core, it's only the revision that's different. They are still basically the same core, with different L2 cache. The bigger die is just because of the cache.

-Dan

[spectre440]

reposted.

[djbbenn]

Thanks. ;)

-Dan

[spectre440]

no, thank you.

[djbbenn]

I'll look around... there is mistakes in it. Corrected a few already, it just got a little hard on the head when working on all those cpu's. :)

-Dan

[spectre440]

nope. my bad.
he has a newcastle

[DevilDriver]

May be a little late, or already mentioned, but the 754 Newcastle 3400+ is 2.4Ghz 200x12. Not 2.2 as listed.

[djbbenn]

Fixed.

-Dan

[ElPenguino]

Seems to be missing several Celeron D processors, especially the socket 478 versions.

According to CPU-Z, I have a Celeron D 320, mPGA-478, 2400mHz, 18x multiplier, 90nm, 1.4v(unsure), 16KB L1, 256KB L2, no L3. The TDP I'm not sure of.

Incidentally, I believe the proper codename for all Celeron D processors is actually Prescott-256, not just Prescott.

I also had a 1700mHz Willamette Celeron, 17x multiplier, 128KB L2, mPGA-478. The rest of the specs I'm unsure of, as it's not usable at the moment.

[djbbenn]

Some of the Celerons are missing, it's very hard to get every single cpu in there, but we're working on it. The core is a Prescott, but it has 256KB of L2 cache instead of 1024KB, and that's the reason for the "Prescott-256".

-Dan

[ElPenguino]

it's a modified prescott core, actually...
in more ways than just cache, too.

edit: I almost forgot... the 3x6 and 3x1 celeron Ds are pretty much identical to their 3x5 and 3x0 counterparts, except they have EM64T and XD enabled.

[djbbenn]

They have less cache, a slower fsb (higher mulitplier in return) and a few less features (HT, NX-Bit in some cases, etc). They are still the Prescott core, just "modified" like you said.

-Dan

[Steven B]

Celerons are chips that dont make spec for the P4, their cache is cut, and some features disabled, it depends on the wafer.

[KennyT772]

very true. case in point my old celeron 2.7 (100x27) clocked up to 3.5 stabily at stock voltage. definatly a p4 with lower clocks.

[Dippyskoodlez]

Albany 2800+M in my laptop. 90nm ofcourse, 1600mhz. 256kb L2

[djbbenn]

Core 2 Extreme/Duo (Conroes & Allendales) have been added... if anyone knows the die size in mm² for them, please post them here. :)

Edit: Also for Merom, the mobile Conroes. (both 4MB and 2MB versions)

-Dan

[Migons]

Conroes' and Allendales' die size is 143 mm2. Even though Allendale has half the L2, it's still physically on the die, half is just disabled.

[djbbenn]

Can you send me the link for that information?

-Dan

[Migons]

Can you send me the link for that information?

-Dan

http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?i=2795
(check Manufacturing Comparison section at the end of the page)

Same info was in Muropaketti's article about Core 2 Duo.

[djbbenn]

Thanks Migons.

-Dan

[Migons]

Allendales' transistor count is also 291M.

Although Tom's Hardware says (http://www.tomshardware.com/2006/07/14/core2_duo_knocks_out_athlon_64/page4.html) Allendales' transistor count would be 167M and die size 111 mm^2, it's as I said before.

And Athlon 64 3500+ ClawHammer's (http://www.techpowerup.com/cpudb/details.php?id=318) transistor count is 106M (not 69M). The reason is the same as with Allendale - disabled L2 is still on the die.

[reckon]

Hello.

I'm a bit confused and I may be mixing ideas/concepts. Even though Conroe package system it is showed everywhere as the FC-LGA4, in this official document by Intel (http://www.intel.com/design/packtech/Other_MDDS.pdf) at page 43 they state that Conroe uses FC LGA6 .

Here in this other document (http://download.intel.com/design/processor/datashts/31327801.pdf) at page 37 also states that the processor is packaged in a Flip-Chip Land Grid Array (FC-LGA6) package that interfaces with the motherboard via an LGA775 socket.

Thanks in advance.

[djbbenn]

Yeah they do use FC-LGA6, I'll have to change it. Thanks for bringing that up.

-Dan

[gratou]

I concur with additional bus speed column suggestion, and also an extensions (MMX, SSE2, CoolnQuiet, etc) column.
But the most useful addition imho would be stepping. :)

A comments column for stuff like this
http://www.short-media.com/review.php?p=10&r=300
would also come handy.

The error: many sempron (like 3000+ or 3200+ 754) have L2 128kB, not 256, as seen by clicking details here:
http://www.amdcompare.com/us-en/desktop/Default.aspx

Cheers on a great start! :toast:

[Dippyskoodlez]

I concur with additional bus speed column suggestion, and also an extensions (MMX, SSE2, CoolnQuiet, etc) column.
But the most useful addition imho would be stepping. :)

A comments column for stuff like this
http://www.short-media.com/review.php?p=10&r=300
would also come handy.

The error: many sempron (like 3000+ or 3200+ 754) have L2 128kB, not 256, as seen by clicking details here:
http://www.amdcompare.com/us-en/desktop/Default.aspx

Cheers on a great start! :toast:

not so much stepping as theres way too many, but revision would be useful. E4, E6, etc.

As for comments, no.. that gets abused way too much, unless its heavily moderated. :banghead:

too many people "ZOMG THIS CPU BLOWS" or "ZOMG THIS CPU PWNZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ....."

Regarding general comments, anyways.

[gratou]

Agreed on all counts. Objective data only. :)

Info is scattered all over the place. Bits like that on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sempron are good, but a central repository would be so useful:

Models for Socket 754

Paris (130 nm SOI)

* L1-Cache: 64 + 64 KiB (Data + Instructions)
* L2-Cache: 256 KiB, fullspeed
* MMX, 3DNow!, SSE, SSE2
* Enhanced Virus Protection (NX bit)
* Integrated DDR memory controller
* Socket 754, 800 MHz HyperTransport
* VCore: 1.4 V
* First release: July 28, 2004
* Clockrate: 1800 MHz (3100+)
* Stepping: CG (Part No.: *AX)

Palermo (90 nm SOI)

* Early models (stepping D0) are downlabeled "Oakville" mobile Athlon64
* L1-Cache: 64 + 64 KiB (Data + Instructions)
* L2-Cache: 128/256 KiB, fullspeed
* MMX, 3DNow!, SSE, SSE2
* SSE3 support on E3 and E6 steppings
* AMD64 on E6 stepping
* Cool'n'Quiet (Sempron 3000+ and higher)
* Enhanced Virus Protection (NX bit)
* Integrated DDR memory controller
* Socket 754, 800 MHz HyperTransport
* VCore: 1.4 V
* First release: February 2005
* Clockrate: 1400 - 2000 MHz
o 128 KiB L2-Cache (Sempron 2600+, 3000+, 3300+)
o 256 KiB L2-Cache (Sempron 2500+, 2800+, 3100+, 3400+)
* Steppings: D0 (Part No.: *BA), E3 (Part No.: *BO), E6 (Part No.: *BX)

[Rhino666]

Hi!

There are a few things not okay about the CPU database here as I noticed.

So, the first thing about x2 processors that they have twice L2 cache, because the full speed on-core cache memory is used on both cores! So eg. 2x512kB (~1024kB) would be efficient.

The second:

Athlon 64 X2 3800+ Windsor uPGA AM2 90nm 2000MHz 10x 1.35V 128K 512K 0K 89W
Athlon 64 X2 3800+ Windsor uPGA AM2 90nm 2000MHz 10x 1.25V 128K 512K 0K 65W
Athlon 64 X2 3800+ EE Windsor uPGA AM2 90nm 2000MHz 10x 1.075V 128K 512K 0K 35W

A little mix-up here. On the first line you can see the "plain old" x2 3800+. That's okay. But the second line, the ADO3800IAA5CU is called x2 3800+ EE (Energy Efficient), while the third one, ADD3800IAT5CU is x2 3800+ EE SFF (Energy Efficient, Small Form Factor).

BTW techPowerUp! PWNZ...

[djbbenn]

So, the first thing about x2 processors that they have twice L2 cache, because the full speed on-core cache memory is used on both cores! So eg. 2x512kB (~1024kB) would be efficient.

Yeah we can't do the "2x512" so we have it showing total amount of cache per core. It messes up the search function or something. I've tried to get it changed multiple times.

-Dan

[Rhino666]

So the second identical x2 3800+ EE should be x2 3800+ EE SFF.

And BTW, the x2 3600+ is EE too. :)

[djbbenn]

Look in the comments... I didn't want the name too long. :)

-Dan

[Rhino666]

Oh, sorry, missed that one.

[evil bill]

Hi

I was trying look up what a friends CPU could be from the info he gave me, (a 2.93Ghz P4) but couldn't find it here. From looking on the Intel site, It would seem the the Intel P4 505, 506, 511, 515, 516, 517, an 519 are not on the database - they are all 533Mhz FSB chips, from 2.66Ghz to 3.06 Ghz and with 1MB cache.

[djbbenn]

All added and more. :)

-Dan

[evil bill]

nice one - ta :)

[erocker]

I have an Athlon 64 3400+ 90nm Vencie core that runs stock @ 2.4ghz and has 512kb L2 cache. I got it oem at newegg with a crappy motherboard to replace my old 2800+ Newcastle chip. I don't see it listed. Thanx.

[evil bill]

All added and more. :)

-Dan

just noticed all the 5xx's you added now appear twice or more :confused:

[djbbenn]

Some have different features than other. Look at the sSpec# (Part #), and you'll notice they're different for each CPU. That is what makes it so much work and confusing sometimes.

-Dan

[evil bill]

it certainly is - thanks :)

[vallig]

A new entry here : me :D
I'm a proud owner of an E6750 engineering sample.Here are the specs to be written into the "cpu database"

[iron_gr]

Where is the 185 Opteron?

[djbbenn]

A new entry here : me :D
I'm a proud owner of an E6750 engineering sample.Here are the specs to be written into the "cpu database"

Added...

Where is the 185 Opteron?

Apparently it's not there...

It is now though. ;)

-Dan

[newtekie1]

Celeron D 347, 352, 356, 360, 365

Pentium D 805

[wiak]

missing Opteron 1k,2k,8k series
http://www.amd.com/gb-uk/Processors/ProductInformation/0,,30_118_8796_14309,00.html
:)

[spud107]

anyone heard of amd geode?
http://www.amd.com/us-en/ConnectivitySolutions/ProductInformation/0,,50_2330_9863_10837^10858,00.html
i think its what my cpu is, but been remarked to sempron 2800.

[Dippyskoodlez]

anyone heard of amd geode?
http://www.amd.com/us-en/ConnectivitySolutions/ProductInformation/0,,50_2330_9863_10837^10858,00.html
i think its what my cpu is, but been remarked to sempron 2800.

Geodes are just the uber cream of the crop socket A's, and often times just oddball CPU's that performed at an exceptionally low voltage, and low speed.

Clock them the same as the higher end brethern and its the exact same thing.

geodes are normally clocked around 1ghz, and are ultra low power CPU's.. ~1v I think. ~14w.

[surfsk8snow.jah]

This thing is awesome. Nice Job whoever's in charge of this.
It's missing the new C2D E6x20 series though. They're just mods adding 2M L2 Cache on there, I don't think they're anything else. But for the sake of having them.

[rodneyhchef]

Hi, Love the site, have had alot of useful info off here over the years. Anyway, I was browsing through you CPU database and noticed mine was missing.

http://pic80.picturetrail.com/VOL827/1543131/5794504/257899884.jpg


As you can see from CPU-z it's a thoroughbred cored 2800+ running at 2.25Ghz, (standard clock speed) Benchmark wise it's on par with the 3200+ barton cored unit.

[Dippyskoodlez]

Hi, Love the site, have had alot of useful info off here over the years. Anyway, I was browsing through you CPU database and noticed mine was missing.

http://pic80.picturetrail.com/VOL827/1543131/5794504/257899884.jpg


As you can see from CPU-z it's a thoroughbred cored 2800+ running at 2.25Ghz, (standard clock speed) Benchmark wise it's on par with the 3200+ barton cored unit.


oh wow thats an uncommon cpu :)

[rodneyhchef]

Just done a quick benchmark in sandra:

http://pic80.picturetrail.com/VOL827/1543131/5794504/258123374.jpg

http://pic80.picturetrail.com/VOL827/1543131/5794504/258123375.jpg

Considering the barton CPUs run at 200Mhz and have twice as much L2 cache, I reckon this old thing does alright. :toast:

[Sh0K]

Hi guys,
in this database isn't show Intel E2140 and E2160.

E2140 - > FSB 200 Mhz x 8 Multiplier -> Cache L2 -> 2x1024KB
http://www.overclockers.ru/images/news/2007/05/10/2140_03.jpg

E2160 - > FSB 200 Mhz x 9 Multiplier -> Cache L2 -> 2x1024KB
http://www.kosht.com/vtr/pics/gig_27-05.jpg

[Trigger911]

Your missing this cpu AMD Athlon 64 X2 4200+ Brisbane 2.2GHz Socket AM2 65W (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819103206 its an amd am2 socket) But very informing guide. Too bad its not like the memory where you can post over clock notes

[XeoNoX]

some of the information on that page is INCORRECT, so double check before buying anything if you are comparing with those numbers, take for example the Core 2 Extreme QX6850 has 8MB of L2 Cache, not 4 as it states on that page. Techpowerup, please review your numbers on the latest processors.

[imperialreign]

Nice compilation.

Some thoughts: perhaps having a way to distiguish in the list the differences between two identical processor numbers? For example, seeing two listings for a P4 524 Prescott, both with near similar capabilities, except one is C1E enbaled and the other isn't - it's a little confusing to those not really sure of what makes the two CPU's different, y'know?

Sadly, I'd take a pic of my P4, except that I've lapped the top of it . . .


Another thought on the Pentium 4 listings - if possible, you could make a note whether the CPU multiplier is locked or not. That way you can give those OCers a heads up that might be looking into getting a particular CPU.

[von kain]

anyone with phenoms pic??

[Paradogma]

Another CPU to add...

Intel 3GHz E8400 Wolfdale

http://pic80.picturetrail.com/VOL2015/10867648/19342085/310305266.jpg

and

http://pic80.picturetrail.com/VOL2015/10867648/19342085/310306233.jpg

[evil bill]

is this database dead then? I dont seen many recent additions to it :(

[Polaris573]

The person who was keeping the databased updated has left us. Malware and I are now responsible for keeping the GPU and CPU database updated. However, he will be primarily responsible for the GPU database, while I will keep the CPU database updated. I will try to update most of it this afternoon, however please continue to post missing CPUs or pictures of them here in the future. Thanks.

[adrianx]

von kain I have pictures with phenom 9500 and 9850 in 5-6 hours will post on forum

[paybackdaman]

AMD Athlon x2 6400+?

[adrianx]

amd phenom


http://forums.techpowerup.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=14232&stc=1&d=1210143113

http://forums.techpowerup.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=14233&stc=1&d=1210143113

http://forums.techpowerup.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=14234&stc=1&d=1210143113


the pictures are from my eten x500+ bad phone (was smart phone)

[Polaris573]

I'm in the midst of final exams, so all of you posting processors for me to add, I would like to let you know I'm not ignoring you I'm just really busy. I'll get to them soon, I promise.

[Solaris17]

WTF? r u doing online if your in the middle of exams? FOR SHAME

[adrianx]

Polaris573

this is not urgent, went you can ...

[chuck216]

The Database is missing the AMD Athlon 64 3400+ socket 754 Venice chip running at 2.4 Ghz.

I know this is a rare chip but it does still exist, as I currently own one, at least until my 5600+ dual core arrives later this week.

Here's the cpu-z screen shot to prove it exists :laugh:

[EnergyFX]

E8500 shows 2.1 volt. Shouldn't that be 1.2 volt?