- Joined
- May 27, 2005
- Messages
- 3,651 (0.53/day)
- Location
- Little Rock Arkansas, United States
System Name | Monolith |
---|---|
Processor | Intel Xeon E3110 Wolfdale@3.5GHz |
Motherboard | MSI P35-Neo |
Cooling | Active Air |
Memory | 4GB DDR2 800 |
Video Card(s) | Sapphire HD 3850 512MB PCI-E |
Storage | 1 x 80GB Internal, 1 x 250GB Internal, 1 x 40GB External |
Display(s) | Acer X203w |
Case | Generic black case with locking front bezel |
Audio Device(s) | Creative SB Audigy 2 ZS |
Power Supply | 500 Watt Seasonic M12 |
Software | Windows 7 Ultimate x64 |
Well these are very similiar operating systems, XP is much more flashy and pretty than 2000 and supposedly uses more resources, But 2000 is slightly older. Which has better performance? Does XP have software improvements that allow it to more efficently manage resources and get better performance? Or is it just a flashy version of 2000? Etc. Etc. What does everyone think?