- Joined
- Dec 18, 2005
- Messages
- 8,253 (1.24/day)
System Name | money pit.. |
---|---|
Processor | Intel 9900K 4.8 at 1.152 core voltage minus 0.120 offset |
Motherboard | Asus rog Strix Z370-F Gaming |
Cooling | Dark Rock TF air cooler.. Stock vga air coolers with case side fans to help cooling.. |
Memory | 32 gb corsair vengeance 3200 |
Video Card(s) | Palit Gaming Pro OC 2080TI |
Storage | 150 nvme boot drive partition.. 1T Sandisk sata.. 1T Transend sata.. 1T 970 evo nvme m 2.. |
Display(s) | 27" Asus PG279Q ROG Swift 165Hrz Nvidia G-Sync, IPS.. 2560x1440.. |
Case | Gigabyte mid-tower.. cheap and nothing special.. |
Audio Device(s) | onboard sounds with stereo amp.. |
Power Supply | EVGA 850 watt.. |
Mouse | Logitech G700s |
Keyboard | Logitech K270 |
Software | Win 10 pro.. |
Benchmark Scores | Firestike 29500.. timepsy 14000.. |
Sure you do. Add /numproc=1 to the end of your boot.ini. Bam! Instant single core. lol.
if its as simple as that wile i can sure do it.. and will.. anybody care to guess the results..
trog
ps.. this gets f-cking depressing in one way and good in another.. i have just set my system to use one core.. my argument is entirely backed up.. both the cpu and gpu crysis benches at the resolution i play crisis at score the same.. one core or two..
so ramdom and all u other fooled completely by the multi-bollocks con.. what do u recon..
if the software dont use the multi-whatever there is no point in having it.. most software still dosnt..
i will have a go at supreme commander later just to see just what having one fast core does to that.. i strongly suspect it will play perfectly okay fully maxed out at 1680 x 1050 which is what i have been playing it at..
supreme commander.. about the only game that does make effective use of more than one core.. the pic at 14 fps is about as bad as it gets.. fully maxed out at 16080 x 1050 with just the one core at 3.6 gig.. mostly it runs around 26 fps.. perfectly okay for such a game..
Last edited: