wazzledoozle
New Member
- Joined
- Aug 30, 2004
- Messages
- 5,358 (0.75/day)
- Location
- Seattle
Processor | X2 3800+ @ 2.3 GHz |
---|---|
Motherboard | DFI Lanparty SLI-DR |
Cooling | Zalman CNPS 9500 LED |
Memory | 2x1 Gb OCZ Plat. @ 3-3-2-8-1t 460 MHz |
Video Card(s) | HIS IceQ 4670 512Mb |
Storage | 640Gb & 160Gb western digital sata drives |
Display(s) | Hanns G 19" widescreen LCD w/ DVI 5ms |
Case | Thermaltake Soprano |
Audio Device(s) | Audigy 2 softmod@Audigy 4, Logitech X-530 5:1 |
Power Supply | Coolermaster eXtreme Power Plus 500w |
Software | XP Pro |
Kind of weird, AMD and Intel are switching positions with AMD going for massive bandwidth and with DDR2 and faster cpu/HTT clocks while Intel is going for more efficient architecture.
Who wants to bet once AMD goes 65 nm they will move to a GHz naming scheme like Intel used to? As much as Intel and AMD wanted consumers to look away from the GHz rating, that is still what they look for.
Who wants to bet once AMD goes 65 nm they will move to a GHz naming scheme like Intel used to? As much as Intel and AMD wanted consumers to look away from the GHz rating, that is still what they look for.