• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

L4D2: CPU benchmarks - Phenom II very strong

TheMailMan78

Big Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2007
Messages
22,599 (3.66/day)
Location
'Merica. The Great SOUTH!
System Name TheMailbox 5.0 / The Mailbox 4.5
Processor RYZEN 1700X / Intel i7 2600k @ 4.2GHz
Motherboard Fatal1ty X370 Gaming K4 / Gigabyte Z77X-UP5 TH Intel LGA 1155
Cooling MasterLiquid PRO 280 / Scythe Katana 4
Memory ADATA RGB 16GB DDR4 2666 16-16-16-39 / G.SKILL Sniper Series 16GB DDR3 1866: 9-9-9-24
Video Card(s) MSI 1080 "Duke" with 8Gb of RAM. Boost Clock 1847 MHz / ASUS 780ti
Storage 256Gb M4 SSD / 128Gb Agelity 4 SSD , 500Gb WD (7200)
Display(s) LG 29" Class 21:9 UltraWide® IPS LED Monitor 2560 x 1080 / Dell 27"
Case Cooler Master MASTERBOX 5t / Cooler Master 922 HAF
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC1220 Audio Codec / SupremeFX X-Fi with Bose Companion 2 speakers.
Power Supply Seasonic FOCUS Plus Series SSR-750PX 750W Platinum / SeaSonic X Series X650 Gold
Mouse SteelSeries Sensei (RAW) / Logitech G5
Keyboard Razer BlackWidow / Logitech (Unknown)
Software Windows 10 Pro (64-bit)
Benchmark Scores Benching is for bitches.
I can't say I'm not surprised. ;)

Left 4 Dead 2: Introduction and Engine
Although Valve once again used the Source engine for Left 4 Dead 2, the developers nevertheless modified the structure for the new game. According to Chet Faliszek, inventor of Left 4 Dead, the developers enhanced for example the shaders, the lighting, the particles and the water. Multi-core support, diverse (Post) effects like Color Correction, Motion Blur and FP16-HDR as well as Film Grain are still integrated. Due to Soft Shadows, Self Shadowing, Normal Maps and Wet Surfaces the sceneries appear a little more realistic than before. The Havok physics engine top the technical features of Left 4 Dead 2 off.

Left 4 Dead: Benchmark sequence and results
For our benchmarks we use a 60 second real-time demo sequence which takes place in the park from the second chapter of the "The Parish” Campaign. In the scene we have several Bommers and a Splitter as well as a lot of ordinary enemies. We use a Radeon HD 5870 to display the demo at 1680 x 1050 with maximal details and with as well as without 4x MSAA and 16:1 AF. So all in all the setting is quite challenging for the CPU. We are using the German cut version which runs about 40 percent faster than the international uncut version.

Left 4 Dead 2 benefits a lot from three respectively for cores and thus an Intel C2Q Q6600 is, without AA/AF, almost 45 percent faster than its dual-core counterpart, the C2D E6600. With 4x MSAA/16:1 AF the difference isn't lowered much. An AMD Phenom II X3 720 BE finally is fast enough to run into the graphics limitation (about 130 frame per second on average) - faster CPUs only increase the minimal framerate. As you can see from the results without AA/AF, the Phenom II CPUs are doing quite well and the X4 965 BE is on the same level as the Intel Core i5-750; the X3 720 BE is only slightly behind the Q9650 while the X2 550 BE beats the C2D E8400 noticeably. A Core i7-920 running at 3.5 GHz (Uncore at 2.8 GHz, DDR3-1400) can't really distance itself from the rest - it reaches a max fps results of up to 300 which actually is the engine limit.

Although Left 4 Dead 2 benefits a lot from more than two cores, you are well equipped with a processor like the C2D E6600 or the X2 6400+. Only during the final wave of infected, the framerate drops below 40 fps. So if you want to play Left 4 Dead 2 smoothly in any critical situation, you should have a C2Q Q6600 or a Phenom II X3 720 BE or a faster processor. Intel's SMT does not slow down the game, but doesn't increase the performance either.




Source
 

ChromeDome

New Member
Joined
May 31, 2008
Messages
670 (0.12/day)
System Name Super Budget Gamer Thing lol
Processor AMD 5600+ Windsor @3.0ghz
Motherboard ASUS M3N78-VM AM2/AM2+ Micro ATX
Cooling Thermaltake TR2-R1 Ultra Silence CPU heatsink+fan / 3 exhaust case fans
Memory 3 Gigs Kingston DDR2@800mhz
Video Card(s) PNY 8800GT 512mb OC'd 710/1740/950 - 178.24
Storage 2X 320 gig Seagate Barracuda's @7200rpm - SATA
Display(s) 22in Dell LCD 1680X1050 / 21.6in AOC LCD / Hauppauge TV Tuner
Case Antec Three Hundred
Audio Device(s) Sound Blaster X-Fi Xtreme Audio
Power Supply Antec Earthwatts EA500D 500w
Software Vista, bby <3
Benchmark Scores yay it works! =]
just ordered

i'll be killing zombies with my AMD 5600+ just fine :slap:
 
Joined
Nov 10, 2008
Messages
1,984 (0.35/day)
Processor Intel Core i9 9900k @ 5.1GHZ all core load (8c 16t)
Motherboard MSI MEG Z390 ACE
Cooling Corsair H100i v2 240mm
Memory 32GB Corsair 3200mhz C16 (2x16GB)
Video Card(s) Powercolor RX 6900 XT Red Devil Ultimate (XTXH) @ 2.6ghz core, 2.1ghz mem
Storage 256GB WD Black NVME drive, 4TB across various SSDs/NVMEs, 4TB HDD
Display(s) Asus 32" PG32QUX (4k 144hz mini-LED backlit IPS with freesync & gsync & 1400 nit HDR)
Case Corsair 760T
Power Supply Corsair HX850i
Mouse Logitech G502 Lightspeed on powerplay mousemat
Keyboard Logitech G910
VR HMD Wireless Vive Pro & Valve knuckles
Software Windows 10 Pro
We are using the German cut version which runs about 40 percent faster than the international uncut version.

As soon as i read that i turned off - the german uncut version has bodies vanishing after being killed pretty quick and doesn't have the detailed bodies which can have different bits blown off and have the correct organs in place, which would add a pretty decent load onto the CPU - if they want to do a proper test they should have tested with the maximum possible stress on the cpu - which would need the content missing from the german version.

Still it's good to see the game scaling well with better CPUs. It would have been nice to see them limit a core i7 to 2 real cores and 2 SMT/HT cores just to see if the SMT cores are as good as real cores, and if not how much slower they are (since we have dual core nehalem cpus coming to laptops soon i'm interested to see the effectiveness of SMT for this).
 

BababooeyHTJ

New Member
Joined
Apr 6, 2009
Messages
907 (0.16/day)
Processor i5 3570k
Motherboard Gigabyte Z77 UD5h
Cooling XSPC Raystrom
Memory 4x4GB DDR3 1600mhz
Video Card(s) 7950 crossfire
Storage a few
Display(s) 27" Catleap
Case Xigmatek Elysium
Audio Device(s) Xonar STX
Power Supply Seasonic X1050
Software Windows 7 X64
Still no faster than Yorkfield clock for clock from what I see.
 
Last edited:
Joined
May 27, 2009
Messages
3,405 (0.62/day)
Location
Brunswick, GA
System Name Haz0
Processor i7-2700K
Motherboard Gigabyte Z68X-UD3H-B3
Cooling Chicken Stock
Memory 16GB G.Skill Ripshits X 1600MHz
Video Card(s) Sapphire 5850
Storage Kingston 128GB SSD + WD Black 640GB + 2x 1.5TB
Display(s) 24" Acer G245HQ + 19" Lenovo L194
Case Antec NSK-4482 Orangified
Audio Device(s) X-Fi XtremeGamer
Power Supply Corsair TX750W
Software Windows 7: Electric Boogaloo
Interesting. Props to them though, I know doing CPU gaming benchmarks are a lot tougher to do than GPU benchmarks.
 

wolf

Performance Enthusiast
Joined
May 7, 2007
Messages
7,758 (1.25/day)
System Name MightyX
Processor Ryzen 5800X3D
Motherboard Gigabyte X570 I Aorus Pro WiFi
Cooling Scythe Fuma 2
Memory 32GB DDR4 3600 CL16
Video Card(s) Asus TUF RTX3080 Deshrouded
Storage WD Black SN850X 2TB
Display(s) LG 42C2 4K OLED
Case Coolermaster NR200P
Audio Device(s) LG SN5Y / Focal Clear
Power Supply Corsair SF750 Platinum
Mouse Corsair Dark Core RBG Pro SE
Keyboard Glorious GMMK Compact w/pudding
VR HMD Meta Quest 3
Software case populated with Artic P12's
Benchmark Scores 4k120 OLED Gsync bliss
Still no faster than Yorkfield clock for clock from what I see.

Really? second test with no AA shows an i5 750 is indeed faster clock for clock, let alone i7.

Q9650 @ 3ghz = 108 min 163 avg

i5 750 @ 2.66ghz = 123 min 185 avg

i7 860 @ 2.8ghz = 127 min 189 avg

is that not faster clock for clock? But I tend to agree with human_error, in that the test should-have been done with the modded game files or US version to increase stress on the CPU even more.
 

BababooeyHTJ

New Member
Joined
Apr 6, 2009
Messages
907 (0.16/day)
Processor i5 3570k
Motherboard Gigabyte Z77 UD5h
Cooling XSPC Raystrom
Memory 4x4GB DDR3 1600mhz
Video Card(s) 7950 crossfire
Storage a few
Display(s) 27" Catleap
Case Xigmatek Elysium
Audio Device(s) Xonar STX
Power Supply Seasonic X1050
Software Windows 7 X64
Really? second test with no AA shows an i5 750 is indeed faster clock for clock, let alone i7.

Q9650 @ 3ghz = 108 min 163 avg

i5 750 @ 2.66ghz = 123 min 185 avg

i7 860 @ 2.8ghz = 127 min 189 avg

is that not faster clock for clock? But I tend to agree with human_error, in that the test should-have been done with the modded game files or US version to increase stress on the CPU even more.

I was talking about Phenom 2 with the tread title was referring to as being strong in this game. While it is performing well in this game it's still no better than Yorkfield clock for clock. Bloomfield and Lynfield performed quite well. Either way who is going to be running a 5870 at 1680x1050 with no AA? As soon as you add 4xAA and 16xAF they all perform the same anyways.
 

wolf

Performance Enthusiast
Joined
May 7, 2007
Messages
7,758 (1.25/day)
System Name MightyX
Processor Ryzen 5800X3D
Motherboard Gigabyte X570 I Aorus Pro WiFi
Cooling Scythe Fuma 2
Memory 32GB DDR4 3600 CL16
Video Card(s) Asus TUF RTX3080 Deshrouded
Storage WD Black SN850X 2TB
Display(s) LG 42C2 4K OLED
Case Coolermaster NR200P
Audio Device(s) LG SN5Y / Focal Clear
Power Supply Corsair SF750 Platinum
Mouse Corsair Dark Core RBG Pro SE
Keyboard Glorious GMMK Compact w/pudding
VR HMD Meta Quest 3
Software case populated with Artic P12's
Benchmark Scores 4k120 OLED Gsync bliss
LoL my bad! completely overlooked PII vs Yorkfield :eek:

nevertheless its totally i5/i7 ftw, can hardly argue with that, especially with i5 being so affordable, and even hit no HT obviously faster clock for clock.
 
Joined
Sep 5, 2009
Messages
1,304 (0.24/day)
System Name Suck it
Processor i7 860 @ 3.5GHz
Motherboard eVGA p55 FTW
Cooling Noctua NH-U12P SE 2
Memory 4gb Corsair Dominator @ 1600
Video Card(s) X2 Supercharged 570's
Storage 1 80gb Intel SSD/2 128gb Mushkin IO SSDs raid 0/1 500gb WD Caviar Black/2tb WD Caviar Black
Display(s) ASUS MT276HE 27"
Case Coolermaster HAF 932
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Ultra X4 1050W
Software Windows 7 Ultimate (x64)
nice to see that the i7 860 benched fine. was surprised how smooth l4d2 demo ran with a 250 and the 860.
 

BababooeyHTJ

New Member
Joined
Apr 6, 2009
Messages
907 (0.16/day)
Processor i5 3570k
Motherboard Gigabyte Z77 UD5h
Cooling XSPC Raystrom
Memory 4x4GB DDR3 1600mhz
Video Card(s) 7950 crossfire
Storage a few
Display(s) 27" Catleap
Case Xigmatek Elysium
Audio Device(s) Xonar STX
Power Supply Seasonic X1050
Software Windows 7 X64
LoL my bad! completely overlooked PII vs Yorkfield :eek:

nevertheless its totally i5/i7 ftw, can hardly argue with that, especially with i5 being so affordable, and even hit no HT obviously faster clock for clock.

Seriously, I want that i5 750 pretty bad. It would be a nice upgrade from my Q9650. On most apps because of turbo mode I'm sure that it spanks my overclocked Q9650.
 
Top