Munkul
New Member
- Joined
- Sep 8, 2006
- Messages
- 243 (0.04/day)
- Location
- Cumbria, UK
System Name | Munkuls ol' faithful |
---|---|
Processor | AMD Athlon 64 3200+ @ 2.4ghz 1.45v |
Motherboard | ASrock 939Dual-SATA2 |
Cooling | mixture of Innovatek and Asetek Watercooling w/ Eheim pump |
Memory | 1gb corsair XMS TwinX PC3200; also two further sticks of noname 512mb PC3200 |
Video Card(s) | POV 8800gts 320mb @satndard clocks |
Storage | 500gb hitachi deskstar |
Display(s) | 2x 17" CRTs |
Case | Raidmax Ninja with triple fan radiator mounted on top |
Audio Device(s) | onboard AC'97 - yeah, its crap. |
Power Supply | OCZ 600w PSU |
Software | XP Pro |
bought this game on saturday and love it for the muscle cars. if it wasnt for the dodge charger (Dukes of Hazzard, anyone?) it would be a suck ass game.
they change the whole game from being a boring generic racer to a fast, precision-demanding challenge.
one of my biggest gripes with this game is that the graphics look.... well, awful, if youve ever played Most Wanted. this is after i have set everything i can find to the max and 1240x1074 with 4x AA
however, i have seen screenshots and reveiews that praise the graphics and the screenshots look far more impressive.
is it to do with me not having shader model 3?
they change the whole game from being a boring generic racer to a fast, precision-demanding challenge.
one of my biggest gripes with this game is that the graphics look.... well, awful, if youve ever played Most Wanted. this is after i have set everything i can find to the max and 1240x1074 with 4x AA
however, i have seen screenshots and reveiews that praise the graphics and the screenshots look far more impressive.
is it to do with me not having shader model 3?