Has Anyone Believe me? Crysis rocks 2900XT

Has Anyone Believe me? Crysis rocks 2900xt

I made a thread long time ago about my prediction, belief and opinion that Crysis will perform better on ATI cards than Nvidia Cards.... I was gonna continue to that thread but I search and search no find the thread so decided to make new.

my prediction, belief and opinion that Crysis will perform better on ATI cards than Nvidia Cards due to the huge amount of Shader Power on the ATI cards..... Crysis is a graphic like most PS3 titles (CG-like gameplay) which determine by shader power and eats lots of shader power. ATI cards happend to have superior Shader Power than Nvidia. Sure Nvidia cards such as the 8800 ultra can beat the 2900xt in non CG-like gameplay such as Battlefield 2142 but in CG-like gameplay graphic like Crysis.... the table turns..... 2900xt is superior due to the huge amount of shader power.

prediction, belief and opinion:
- 2900XT beats 8800 Ultra in Crysis
- 2900XT beats 8800 GTX in Crysis
- 2900XT beats 8800 GTS in Crysis
- dual 2900XT beats dual 8800 ultra in Crysis
- 2600XT beats 8600 GT in Crysis
- X1950XTX beats 7900 GTX in Crysis
- X1900XTX beats 7900 GTX in Crysis

Heard Crysis demo is out..... so who has 2900xt and 8800 ultra? did you test it? did the 2900xt got better performance than the 8800 ultra in maximum settings? see? told cha!

edit: also dont forget about the system ram! many people these days always says 2gig is enough for every game these days.... it may be true.... but Crysis is a whole different story! Crysis is a real future game! super realistic! and super CG-like gameplay graphic! it needs lots of ram and not just 2gig! 2gig of ram is just a mosquito to the mighty Crysis! I would say 3.5gig to play with average performance and 6gig is high performance and 8gig is True Performance... Guarenteed no sudden hiccup laggness. steady and smooth... super stabilized. remember everything I say is base on super maximum settings.

ok