• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Samsung F3 vs Seagate 7200.12 vs WD 640 Black

Joined
Apr 4, 2008
Messages
4,686 (0.80/day)
System Name Obelisc
Processor i7 3770k @ 4.8 GHz
Motherboard Asus P8Z77-V
Cooling H110
Memory 16GB(4x4) @ 2400 MHz 9-11-11-31
Video Card(s) GTX 780 Ti
Storage 850 EVO 1TB, 2x 5TB Toshiba
Case T81
Audio Device(s) X-Fi Titanium HD
Power Supply EVGA 850 T2 80+ TITANIUM
Software Win10 64bit
The middle one is from fits, the samsung and WD are mine. Samsung outright beats the seagate, WD has the access time. Both 500s are single platter, WD is double. The samsung only cost me $50 free shipping.


Only real problem with samsung is I don't trust their reliability... even if they are the fastest drives out now... according to this at least http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/storage/2009/10/06/samsung-spinpoint-f3-1tb-review/1
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jul 19, 2006
Messages
43,587 (6.71/day)
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Motherboard ASUS TUF x670e
Cooling EK AIO 360. Phantek T30 fans.
Memory 32GB G.Skill 6000Mhz
Video Card(s) Asus RTX 4090
Storage WD m.2
Display(s) LG C2 Evo OLED 42"
Case Lian Li PC 011 Dynamic Evo
Audio Device(s) Topping E70 DAC, SMSL SP200 Headphone Amp.
Power Supply FSP Hydro Ti PRO 1000W
Mouse Razer Basilisk V3 Pro
Keyboard Tester84
Software Windows 11
Ouch! My 1tb 7200.12 gets much better performance than that! Maybe it's the difference of storage controllers. :ohwell:
 

Solaris17

Super Dainty Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Aug 16, 2005
Messages
25,897 (3.79/day)
Location
Alabama
System Name Rocinante
Processor I9 14900KS
Motherboard EVGA z690 Dark KINGPIN (modded BIOS)
Cooling EK-AIO Elite 360 D-RGB
Memory 64GB Gskill Trident Z5 DDR5 6000 @6400
Video Card(s) MSI SUPRIM Liquid X 4090
Storage 1x 500GB 980 Pro | 1x 1TB 980 Pro | 1x 8TB Corsair MP400
Display(s) Odyssey OLED G9 G95SC
Case Lian Li o11 Evo Dynamic White
Audio Device(s) Moondrop S8's on Schiit Hel 2e
Power Supply Bequiet! Power Pro 12 1500w
Mouse Lamzu Atlantis mini (White)
Keyboard Monsgeek M3 Lavender, Akko Crystal Blues
VR HMD Quest 3
Software Windows 11
Benchmark Scores I dont have time for that.


EDIT: agree with E my sammy F1 1TB gets better performance than that drive. i avg above 100mb/s minimum (when the drive was ampty.) im like 700GB in and i avg about 75 or so min
 
Joined
Apr 4, 2008
Messages
4,686 (0.80/day)
System Name Obelisc
Processor i7 3770k @ 4.8 GHz
Motherboard Asus P8Z77-V
Cooling H110
Memory 16GB(4x4) @ 2400 MHz 9-11-11-31
Video Card(s) GTX 780 Ti
Storage 850 EVO 1TB, 2x 5TB Toshiba
Case T81
Audio Device(s) X-Fi Titanium HD
Power Supply EVGA 850 T2 80+ TITANIUM
Software Win10 64bit
Well I don't know how to explain the minimum rates, only thing I see that's similar with your rigs is you both have cpus with high memory bandwidth? Not sure if that really relates.
 

Solaris17

Super Dainty Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Aug 16, 2005
Messages
25,897 (3.79/day)
Location
Alabama
System Name Rocinante
Processor I9 14900KS
Motherboard EVGA z690 Dark KINGPIN (modded BIOS)
Cooling EK-AIO Elite 360 D-RGB
Memory 64GB Gskill Trident Z5 DDR5 6000 @6400
Video Card(s) MSI SUPRIM Liquid X 4090
Storage 1x 500GB 980 Pro | 1x 1TB 980 Pro | 1x 8TB Corsair MP400
Display(s) Odyssey OLED G9 G95SC
Case Lian Li o11 Evo Dynamic White
Audio Device(s) Moondrop S8's on Schiit Hel 2e
Power Supply Bequiet! Power Pro 12 1500w
Mouse Lamzu Atlantis mini (White)
Keyboard Monsgeek M3 Lavender, Akko Crystal Blues
VR HMD Quest 3
Software Windows 11
Benchmark Scores I dont have time for that.
no thats purely ram based. our bus speed is still the same as it has to be locked
 
Joined
Jul 19, 2006
Messages
43,587 (6.71/day)
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Motherboard ASUS TUF x670e
Cooling EK AIO 360. Phantek T30 fans.
Memory 32GB G.Skill 6000Mhz
Video Card(s) Asus RTX 4090
Storage WD m.2
Display(s) LG C2 Evo OLED 42"
Case Lian Li PC 011 Dynamic Evo
Audio Device(s) Topping E70 DAC, SMSL SP200 Headphone Amp.
Power Supply FSP Hydro Ti PRO 1000W
Mouse Razer Basilisk V3 Pro
Keyboard Tester84
Software Windows 11
Joined
Apr 4, 2008
Messages
4,686 (0.80/day)
System Name Obelisc
Processor i7 3770k @ 4.8 GHz
Motherboard Asus P8Z77-V
Cooling H110
Memory 16GB(4x4) @ 2400 MHz 9-11-11-31
Video Card(s) GTX 780 Ti
Storage 850 EVO 1TB, 2x 5TB Toshiba
Case T81
Audio Device(s) X-Fi Titanium HD
Power Supply EVGA 850 T2 80+ TITANIUM
Software Win10 64bit
I did that first thing when I installed win7 a week ago. All I can think is you two have much newer controllers? Because the center benchmark from fits and many others I've seen around the forum match up to mine, having above 100mb/s minimum seems to be a bit uncommon.
 
Joined
May 12, 2009
Messages
5,196 (0.95/day)
System Name Dust Collector
Processor AMD Ryzen 5 3600X
Motherboard Asus B550I Aorus Pro WiFi AX
Cooling Alpenfohn Black Ridge V2 w/ Noctua NF-A9x14
Memory Corsair Vengeance LPX 16GB DDR4 3200MHz/CL16
Video Card(s) Power Color Red Dragon RX 5700 XT
Storage Samsung EVO+ 500GB NVMe
Display(s) Dell S2721DGF
Case Dan Case A4
Power Supply Corsair SF600 Platinum
Mouse Logitech G603
Keyboard Logitech G613
Sorry about the thread jack, but at the same price would you get a 500GB F3 or 500GB .12? I'm looking to grab my dad a new HDD since the old .9 makes really loud grinding noises (been like that since day 1), and I don't want to get another Caviar Black since I have one.
 

newtekie1

Semi-Retired Folder
Joined
Nov 22, 2005
Messages
28,472 (4.23/day)
Location
Indiana, USA
Processor Intel Core i7 10850K@5.2GHz
Motherboard AsRock Z470 Taichi
Cooling Corsair H115i Pro w/ Noctua NF-A14 Fans
Memory 32GB DDR4-3600
Video Card(s) RTX 2070 Super
Storage 500GB SX8200 Pro + 8TB with 1TB SSD Cache
Display(s) Acer Nitro VG280K 4K 28"
Case Fractal Design Define S
Audio Device(s) Onboard is good enough for me
Power Supply eVGA SuperNOVA 1000w G3
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
Wow, WTH is wrong with that Western Digital? My seagate LP drives average only 10MB/s slower, and they are 5900RPM drives...:shadedshu
 
Joined
Nov 22, 2008
Messages
3,779 (0.67/day)
Location
Latin America, Uruguay
System Name The Lizard v2.4
Processor Intel Celeron G1840 (for the time being
Motherboard Gigabyte GA-H81-S2PH
Cooling Intel Stock Fan
Memory 16GB Kingston HyperX 1600
Video Card(s) MSI Gaming GTX 750Ti (For the time being)
Storage 500GB Samsung F1, 160GB Maxtor "Older than god"
Display(s) AOC 28' LCD
Case Coolermaster N200
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Antec VP500P
Software Windows 7 Ultimate x64
Benchmark Scores No crashes in the last 24 minutes.
Sorry about the thread jack, but at the same price would you get a 500GB F3 or 500GB .12? I'm looking to grab my dad a new HDD since the old .9 makes really loud grinding noises (been like that since day 1), and I don't want to get another Caviar Black since I have one.

if i were you i would go for seagate. I know their reliability is good (at least in my case)
 

kylzer

New Member
Joined
May 10, 2009
Messages
511 (0.09/day)
Location
192.168.1.1
System Name NDA BD
Processor NDA
Motherboard NDA
Cooling --------------
Memory Corsair GTX 1866Mhz 2x4GB
Video Card(s) --------------
Storage WDBlack 640GB and WDGreen 750GB
Display(s) BenQ G2200HD
Case ---------------
Audio Device(s) Built in
Power Supply Silverstone 500w
Software Win7 64
Ive got a 640black ill post my results later as i get different from that.
 
Joined
Aug 16, 2007
Messages
7,180 (1.18/day)
WD drives win in reliability, the new F3 was supposed to be faster than the F1. F2 was just some "green" low power thing i think?

Seagate are okay mixed bag your drive will either die rather quick or live forever, i have a seagate 7200.12 tis okay has 32mb of cache just a backup drive really.

The F1 had sector problems tho, got a FREE refund and a replacement cannot beat that!
Money no expense id get a fast WD drive tho, for me at the time the F1 was fast and cheap or well SSD but they are low capacity right now so...
 
Joined
Jul 19, 2006
Messages
43,587 (6.71/day)
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Motherboard ASUS TUF x670e
Cooling EK AIO 360. Phantek T30 fans.
Memory 32GB G.Skill 6000Mhz
Video Card(s) Asus RTX 4090
Storage WD m.2
Display(s) LG C2 Evo OLED 42"
Case Lian Li PC 011 Dynamic Evo
Audio Device(s) Topping E70 DAC, SMSL SP200 Headphone Amp.
Power Supply FSP Hydro Ti PRO 1000W
Mouse Razer Basilisk V3 Pro
Keyboard Tester84
Software Windows 11
Ouch! My 1tb 7200.12 gets much better performance than that! Maybe it's the difference of storage controllers. :ohwell:

I need to put my foot in my mouth. :eek: My 7200.12 gets the exact same performance as that with an AMD system. One thing I just noticed though is your CPU usage for that drive is insanely high!
 

theonedub

habe fidem
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
8,025 (1.47/day)
Location
Northern CA, USA
System Name Erakith || AsRock NUCS
Processor AMD ThreadRipper 2990WX ES (32c/64t 3.5ghz@1.02v) || Intel i7 1360P Raptor Lake-P
Motherboard MSI X399 MEG Creation || AsRock OE
Cooling EK Supremacy TR4 Full Nickel, D5 w/ EK Top, 2X EK-CoolStream XTX 360 & Photon 270 Res || OE
Memory 32GB (4x8GB) Corsair Vengeance PRO RGB DDR4 3000|| 2x16GB Corsair DDR4
Video Card(s) Vega 64 EK FC|| Intel Iris Xe
Storage 250gb WD Black NVMe & (2) 2TB Intel 660p NVMe || 2TB Corsair MP600 Pro
Display(s) 34" Dell Ultrasharp U3415W
Case CaseLabs Merlin SM8 || Aluminum Unibody
Power Supply Corsair HX1000
Mouse Corsair Harpoon Wireless RGB
Keyboard Corsair Strafe RGB w/ Cherry MX Silent
Software Windows 10 Pro x64 || WIndows 11 Pro x64
Benchmark Scores WCG & F@H Only
Joined
Oct 4, 2007
Messages
2,452 (0.41/day)
System Name PC
Processor i7 9700KF
Motherboard MSI Z390 A PRO
Cooling Noctua NH-U14S
Memory 32GB Corsair Vengeance DDR4 3000mhz
Video Card(s) PALIT RTX 4070 Dual 12Gb
Storage 2X Crucial MX500 2TB SSD, Samsung 850 pro 512gb SSD
Display(s) DELL C34H89x 34" Ultrawide
Case Corsair Obsidian 550D
Audio Device(s) Audioengine A5+ Speakers
Power Supply Corsair RM750
Mouse Logitech G403
Keyboard Corsair Vengeance K70
Software Windows 10 64bit
i just bought a 1TB samsung F3 to go into my main rig earlier today (arriving tomorrow morning!).... have a 250Gb samsung drive in my spare pc which is on 24/7 for the last 3 years or so with no issues.... i trust these sammy drives as much as i trust WD drives... and on top of it they run loads cooler and quieter ;)
 
Joined
Aug 16, 2007
Messages
7,180 (1.18/day)
i just bought a 1TB samsung F3 to go into my main rig earlier today (arriving tomorrow morning!).... have a 250Gb samsung drive in my spare pc which is on 24/7 for the last 3 years or so with no issues.... i trust these sammy drives as much as i trust WD drives... and on top of it they run loads cooler and quieter ;)

samsung drives are quiet, cool and not power hungry
 
Joined
Apr 4, 2008
Messages
4,686 (0.80/day)
System Name Obelisc
Processor i7 3770k @ 4.8 GHz
Motherboard Asus P8Z77-V
Cooling H110
Memory 16GB(4x4) @ 2400 MHz 9-11-11-31
Video Card(s) GTX 780 Ti
Storage 850 EVO 1TB, 2x 5TB Toshiba
Case T81
Audio Device(s) X-Fi Titanium HD
Power Supply EVGA 850 T2 80+ TITANIUM
Software Win10 64bit
I suppose it's worth noting the two drives I tested are half full but recently defraged. I recall the samsung scoring higher when it was empty but I don't remember what it got.
 
Joined
Nov 4, 2005
Messages
11,691 (1.73/day)
System Name Compy 386
Processor 7800X3D
Motherboard Asus
Cooling Air for now.....
Memory 64 GB DDR5 6400Mhz
Video Card(s) 7900XTX 310 Merc
Storage Samsung 990 2TB, 2 SP 2TB SSDs and over 10TB spinning
Display(s) 56" Samsung 4K HDR
Audio Device(s) ATI HDMI
Mouse Logitech MX518
Keyboard Razer
Software A lot.
Benchmark Scores Its fast. Enough.
Comparing a older lower capacity drive to a newer one is wrong. the higher the aurial density the faster the continuous reads and writes.

A 1TB drive has much faster reads and writes as the amount of data per revolution is higher due to more physical disks and heads, or higher data density. A 2TB drive will have faster reads and writes, a smaller drive like a 500 will have slower.



The 640 is only directly comparable to the 500's if they have the same number of platters, heads or were direct competitive offerings/made in the same short time frame.
 
Joined
May 16, 2008
Messages
1,258 (0.22/day)
Location
North Carolina
http://img.techpowerup.org/091030/poke.png

EDIT: agree with E my sammy F1 1TB gets better performance than that drive. i avg above 100mb/s minimum (when the drive was ampty.) im like 700GB in and i avg about 75 or so min
AFAIK, hdd bandwidth has nothing do do with how full it is. Any specific point on a hard drive can deliver data a a certain speed regardless of what that data is (or isn't). I could be wrong, but it doesn't make sense that the fuller it gets, the slower a benchmark is.

Wow, WTH is wrong with that Western Digital? My seagate LP drives average only 10MB/s slower, and they are 5900RPM drives...:shadedshu
Platter density. 500GB @ 5900rpm vs 320GB @ 7200rpm. But I guarantee your access time on that LP drive isn't under 12ms! ;) Big platters give high bandwidth but 5900rpm gives slow access times.


Now those benches bring up a new question... Access times or bandwidth? The WD Black has a sub 12ms access time, which I'm sure has to be in the top 3 for 7200rpm drives. However, the Samsung can deliver data 24% faster on average, sequentially. I'm more inclined to the WD Black unless I have a specific need for sequential reads.
 
Last edited:

newtekie1

Semi-Retired Folder
Joined
Nov 22, 2005
Messages
28,472 (4.23/day)
Location
Indiana, USA
Processor Intel Core i7 10850K@5.2GHz
Motherboard AsRock Z470 Taichi
Cooling Corsair H115i Pro w/ Noctua NF-A14 Fans
Memory 32GB DDR4-3600
Video Card(s) RTX 2070 Super
Storage 500GB SX8200 Pro + 8TB with 1TB SSD Cache
Display(s) Acer Nitro VG280K 4K 28"
Case Fractal Design Define S
Audio Device(s) Onboard is good enough for me
Power Supply eVGA SuperNOVA 1000w G3
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
Platter density. 500GB @ 5900rpm vs 320GB @ 7200rpm. But I guarantee your access time on that LP drive isn't under 12ms! ;) Big platters give high bandwidth but 5900rpm gives slow access times.

13.0ms exactly, so faster than the other two drives, and only 1ms slower than the WD. Not bad, the access time difference wouldn't even be noticeable.
 
Joined
May 16, 2008
Messages
1,258 (0.22/day)
Location
North Carolina
13.0ms exactly, so faster than the other two drives, and only 1ms slower than the WD. Not bad, the access time difference wouldn't even be noticeable.
I find it hard to believe that a 5900rpm hard drive can achieve an access time of 13ms. Seagate has a drive called the Pipeline HD Pro, which is not a part of the LP series and it spins at 7200rpm and has a capacity of 1TB. Do you have this drive, by chance?
 

newtekie1

Semi-Retired Folder
Joined
Nov 22, 2005
Messages
28,472 (4.23/day)
Location
Indiana, USA
Processor Intel Core i7 10850K@5.2GHz
Motherboard AsRock Z470 Taichi
Cooling Corsair H115i Pro w/ Noctua NF-A14 Fans
Memory 32GB DDR4-3600
Video Card(s) RTX 2070 Super
Storage 500GB SX8200 Pro + 8TB with 1TB SSD Cache
Display(s) Acer Nitro VG280K 4K 28"
Case Fractal Design Define S
Audio Device(s) Onboard is good enough for me
Power Supply eVGA SuperNOVA 1000w G3
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
I find it hard to believe that a 5900rpm hard drive can achieve an access time of 13ms. Seagate has a drive called the Pipeline HD Pro, which is not a part of the LP series and it spins at 7200rpm and has a capacity of 1TB. Do you have this drive, by chance?

Nope, I have LP drive, ST31500541AS to be exact.


Ignore CPU usage, F@H was running in the background.
 
Joined
Apr 4, 2008
Messages
4,686 (0.80/day)
System Name Obelisc
Processor i7 3770k @ 4.8 GHz
Motherboard Asus P8Z77-V
Cooling H110
Memory 16GB(4x4) @ 2400 MHz 9-11-11-31
Video Card(s) GTX 780 Ti
Storage 850 EVO 1TB, 2x 5TB Toshiba
Case T81
Audio Device(s) X-Fi Titanium HD
Power Supply EVGA 850 T2 80+ TITANIUM
Software Win10 64bit
This is what someone reports for the 1 TB F3 on newegg.

Burst rate: 165 MB/sec
Max Read: 148 MB/sec
Avg Read: 117MB/sec
Min Read: 72 MB/sec
Access time: 13.1 ms

Seems pretty close to what I got on the single platter version, though for some reason the access time is better despite being the 2 platter version? I suppose that's just differences between chipsets and how full/fraged the drives are.

Maybe we need to start a thread where everyone posts their hd tune results along side their chipsets and a general statement about how full/fraged it is. The first post can be updated with a direct link to posts with the hd tune results, grouping them by exact drive models. So people can see differences between drives, and differences between the same drive, both on the same and different chipsets. Might not be necessary, but could be useful.

On a related note, I find my brother's old raptor results interesting. Def. wins latency, but nothing else.

 
Joined
Oct 4, 2007
Messages
2,452 (0.41/day)
System Name PC
Processor i7 9700KF
Motherboard MSI Z390 A PRO
Cooling Noctua NH-U14S
Memory 32GB Corsair Vengeance DDR4 3000mhz
Video Card(s) PALIT RTX 4070 Dual 12Gb
Storage 2X Crucial MX500 2TB SSD, Samsung 850 pro 512gb SSD
Display(s) DELL C34H89x 34" Ultrawide
Case Corsair Obsidian 550D
Audio Device(s) Audioengine A5+ Speakers
Power Supply Corsair RM750
Mouse Logitech G403
Keyboard Corsair Vengeance K70
Software Windows 10 64bit
ill post up a HDtune of my 1TB sammy F3 i just installed today after i get all my service packs in ;)
 
Top