• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

USB/Pagefile Questions

gamer210

New Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2005
Messages
136 (0.02/day)
Location
University of Texas San Antonio
Processor Intel Core 2 Quad Q9450 @ 2.66 GHz
Motherboard ASUS P5Q Pro
Cooling Zalman CNPS 9700
Memory Mushkin XP 4GB DDR2 1066
Video Card(s) 2x Radeon HD 4850
Storage Seagate 750 GB w/ 32MB Cache
Display(s) Dell 2007WFP Rev A04 S-IPS
Case Tuniq 3
Audio Device(s) Asus Xonar DX
Power Supply PC Power & Cooling 610
Software Microsoft Windows Vista Business 64-bit
I have a few questions about USB in general. I have an Seagate 160GB external hdd (FAT32), and I was wondering if moving the page file to the external disk would garner any extra performance gains. I was also wondering if there is a difference in the transer rate from the USB->USB and HDD->USB. I was thinking about using HdTach on my external drive, so I think I'll give that a try.
 

randomperson21

New Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2005
Messages
1,531 (0.23/day)
Location
San Luis Obispo, CA
Processor AMD Athlon64 X2 3800+ @ 2.4Ghz
Motherboard ECS NForce4 A-939
Cooling CPU: Zalman CNPS7000B-AlCu GFX: Zalman VF-700AlCu, 2x120mm+5x80mm w/ Ultra 7ch Fan Controller
Memory Kingston 2x512MB DDR PC3200 Dual Channel 3-3-3-8
Video Card(s) EVGA Nvidia 7900GT KO Superclocked
Storage 2xSeagate Barracuda 7200.8/9 160GB SATAII NCQ in RAID0: 300GB total capacity
Display(s) Samsung SyncMaster 941BW (19" widescreen, 1440x900)
Case Antec P180B
Audio Device(s) Built in. 5.1Ch Logitech Z-5500 500w soundsystem, digital Coax connection
Power Supply Spire 500W
Software Windows Vista Ultimate
i'd run hdtach on it first.

i had a fujitsu laptop hdd running thru usb at one time, but that was a heck of a lot slower than my desktop setup.

Personally, i don't see any reason to offload it to an external device, unless you are running out of space on your internal hdd, or if your internal is (for some reason) slower than your external...
 
Joined
Apr 9, 2006
Messages
100 (0.02/day)
System Name Hell PC
Processor Intel Core i7 4820k @ 4'50GHz
Motherboard Gigabyte GA-X79-UD3 BIOS F17
Cooling Noctua NH-D14
Memory 4x 4GB G.Skill Ripjaws DDR3 1333
Video Card(s) Asus GTX 770 Direct CU II @ 1306/3746
Storage OCZ Vertex 3 240GB SATA III, Seagate 1'5TB SATA II, Seagate 2TB SATA III
Display(s) Acer V243HAObd
Case Thermaltake Overseer RX-1
Audio Device(s) Onboard Realtek ALC898 HD 7.1
Power Supply Nox Pulsar Blue 750w
Software Windows 7 Home Premium SP1 x64
Benchmark Scores 3Dmark Ice Storm: 176205 3Dmark Cloud Gate: 25357 3Dmark Fire Strike: 7760
11 out of 10 times the internal HDD will have better access speed, and better sustained transmission rate than the USB based one. Have for sure that if it wasn't true newer HDDs will not connect through S-ATA, but through USB. Unless you have a partly damaged or extremely old HDD, the performance should be much lower with the USB disk.
 

gamer210

New Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2005
Messages
136 (0.02/day)
Location
University of Texas San Antonio
Processor Intel Core 2 Quad Q9450 @ 2.66 GHz
Motherboard ASUS P5Q Pro
Cooling Zalman CNPS 9700
Memory Mushkin XP 4GB DDR2 1066
Video Card(s) 2x Radeon HD 4850
Storage Seagate 750 GB w/ 32MB Cache
Display(s) Dell 2007WFP Rev A04 S-IPS
Case Tuniq 3
Audio Device(s) Asus Xonar DX
Power Supply PC Power & Cooling 610
Software Microsoft Windows Vista Business 64-bit
UPDATE:

I ran HdTach on the external. The results were pathetic. I uploaded some pics. I also threw in my pny attache (1GB). I thought my results would be a little better than this.
 

Attachments

  • external.jpg
    external.jpg
    112.7 KB · Views: 447
  • internal.jpg
    internal.jpg
    119.3 KB · Views: 445
  • usb.jpg
    usb.jpg
    110.8 KB · Views: 444

randomperson21

New Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2005
Messages
1,531 (0.23/day)
Location
San Luis Obispo, CA
Processor AMD Athlon64 X2 3800+ @ 2.4Ghz
Motherboard ECS NForce4 A-939
Cooling CPU: Zalman CNPS7000B-AlCu GFX: Zalman VF-700AlCu, 2x120mm+5x80mm w/ Ultra 7ch Fan Controller
Memory Kingston 2x512MB DDR PC3200 Dual Channel 3-3-3-8
Video Card(s) EVGA Nvidia 7900GT KO Superclocked
Storage 2xSeagate Barracuda 7200.8/9 160GB SATAII NCQ in RAID0: 300GB total capacity
Display(s) Samsung SyncMaster 941BW (19" widescreen, 1440x900)
Case Antec P180B
Audio Device(s) Built in. 5.1Ch Logitech Z-5500 500w soundsystem, digital Coax connection
Power Supply Spire 500W
Software Windows Vista Ultimate
yep, its usb...
 

exscalibur99

New Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2006
Messages
22 (0.00/day)
Processor Pentium IV 2.4C Ghz
Motherboard Abit IS7-e
Cooling Stock
Memory Mushkin 512x2MB PC3200 Blueline
Video Card(s) Radeon 9800 pro iceQ
Storage Western Digital 250GB PATA
Display(s) Samsung 17"
Audio Device(s) AC97
Power Supply iCute
Software WindowsXP Pro SP2 32bit
I read on some web that when u move your pagefile to a flash drive disk, u will gain an extra performance... is this true?
 

randomperson21

New Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2005
Messages
1,531 (0.23/day)
Location
San Luis Obispo, CA
Processor AMD Athlon64 X2 3800+ @ 2.4Ghz
Motherboard ECS NForce4 A-939
Cooling CPU: Zalman CNPS7000B-AlCu GFX: Zalman VF-700AlCu, 2x120mm+5x80mm w/ Ultra 7ch Fan Controller
Memory Kingston 2x512MB DDR PC3200 Dual Channel 3-3-3-8
Video Card(s) EVGA Nvidia 7900GT KO Superclocked
Storage 2xSeagate Barracuda 7200.8/9 160GB SATAII NCQ in RAID0: 300GB total capacity
Display(s) Samsung SyncMaster 941BW (19" widescreen, 1440x900)
Case Antec P180B
Audio Device(s) Built in. 5.1Ch Logitech Z-5500 500w soundsystem, digital Coax connection
Power Supply Spire 500W
Software Windows Vista Ultimate
personally, i doubt it.
most usb flash disks are extremely slow, in the range of 10-40MB/s transfer rate. my Cruzer Micro thumbdrive gets only 10MB/s

In comparison, a decent internal hdd gets roughly 50MB/s. A good raid setup gets far more (in the range of 250MB/s on my setup)
btw, these are all read speeds. write speeds are a considerable bit slower.

also, flash memory wears out after so many i/o cycles, so putting your pagefile on a usb flash drive will lower its lifespan.

idk if this is what you read about, but windows vista is supposted to have a "superfetch" feature that uses a usb thumb drive. i guess it caches commonly/recently used files on a usb thumb drive, and uses it as a sort of psuedo-pagefile thingy. not too sure how it works.
 
Joined
May 20, 2004
Messages
10,487 (1.44/day)
Even if throughput/accestime is better on your USB disk, which it will never be. USB hangs on your CPU a bit more than your internal disk. Don't bother.
 
Joined
May 28, 2005
Messages
4,994 (0.72/day)
Location
South of England
System Name Box of Distraction
Processor Ryzen 7 1800X
Motherboard Crosshair VI Hero
Cooling Custom watercooling
Memory G.Skill TridentZ 2x8GB @ 3466MHz CL14 1T
Video Card(s) EVGA 1080Ti FE. WC'd & TDP limit increased to 360W.
Storage Samsung 960 Evo 500GB & WD Black 2TB storage drive.
Display(s) Asus ROG Swift PG278QR 27" 1440P 165hz Gsync
Case Phanteks Enthoo Pro M
Audio Device(s) Phillips Fidelio X2 headphones / basic Bose speakers
Power Supply EVGA Supernova 750W G3
Mouse Logitech G602
Keyboard Cherry MX Board 6.0 (mx red switches)
Software Win 10 & Linux Mint
Benchmark Scores https://hwbot.org/user/infrared
Scrap the pagefile all-together and buy yourself some decent memory ;)
 

W1zzard

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
May 14, 2004
Messages
27,051 (3.71/day)
Processor Ryzen 7 5700X
Memory 48 GB
Video Card(s) RTX 4080
Storage 2x HDD RAID 1, 3x M.2 NVMe
Display(s) 30" 2560x1600 + 19" 1280x1024
Software Windows 10 64-bit
usb flash drives have
- too little bandwidth to be fast enough
- access times between 10x faster to 10x slower than hdds
- LIMITED number of write cycles .. typically 100k
- way too high CPU usage on all implementations
 

Alec§taar

New Member
Joined
May 15, 2006
Messages
4,677 (0.71/day)
Location
Someone who's going to find NewTekie1 and teach hi
Processor DualCore AMD Athlon 64x2 4800+ (o/c 2801mhz STABLE (Ketxxx, POGE, Tatty One, ME))
Motherboard ASUS A8N-SLI Premium (PCIe x16, x4, x1)
Cooling PhaseChange Coolermaster CM754/939 (fan/heatsink), Thermalright heatspreaders + fan built on (RAM)
Memory 512mb PC-3200 DDR400 (set DDR-33 for o/c) by Corsair (matched pair, 2x256mb) 200.1/200mhz
Video Card(s) BFG GeForce 7900 GTX OC 512mb GDDR3 ram (o/c manually to 686 core/865 memory) - PhaseChange cooled
Storage Dual "Raptor X" 16mb 10krpm/RAID 0 Promise EX8350 x4 PCIe 128mb & Intel IO chip/CENATEK RocketDrive
Display(s) SONY 19" Trinitron MultiScan 400ps 1600x1200 75hz refresh 32-bit color
Case Antec Super-LanBoy (aluminum baby-tower w/ lower front & upper rear cooling exhaust fans)
Audio Device(s) RealTek AC97 onboard mobo stereo sound (Altec Lansing ACS-45 speakers - 10 yrs. still running!)
Power Supply Antec 500w ATX 2.0 "SmartPower" powersupply
Software Windows Server 2003 SP #1 fully patched, & massively tuned/tweaked to-the-max (plus latest drivers)
infrared said:
Scrap the pagefile all-together and buy yourself some decent memory ;)

Doesn't always work that way man, & I hate to "cross you" like this... but, it's fact:

Some apps will demand it, & the Virtual Memory design of these OS' causes it, & mainly because of the cache mgt. (far from perfect, but the general idea since UNIX days, & later VMS days (upon which NT-based OS' are founded) tend to second it).

The generic idea is to let the cache grow & grow, to offset disk I/O slowness/access... good initially, until you hit a BIG app.

Especially apps with HUGE memory requirements.

The cache has to flush, or eat more, to contain the data for programs in a LIFO manner, iirc... you hit it with a BIG app, like a GAME?

It's like being a gambler, with a ton of dough/gangster roll really... sooner or later, you go "Bust" & have to page!

APK

P.S.=> Wiz, with you 110%, & the weakness is bandwidth, even USB 2.0 imo... which is why I do what I do, to "offset" this... & cannot wait for higher bandwidth, via the DDRDrive X1 PCI-e ramdisk, to replace my PCI 2.2 model CENATEK unit...

Sorry to use a gambler analogy, but I spent time in Atlantic City last nite, & earlier this weekend seeing a blue legend in Alvin Bishop (inspiring stuff)... made the money for the DDRDrive x1 PCI-e, but got "kicked" from a casino no less (accused of counting cards... now, why would I do that)

:)
apk
 
Last edited:

exscalibur99

New Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2006
Messages
22 (0.00/day)
Processor Pentium IV 2.4C Ghz
Motherboard Abit IS7-e
Cooling Stock
Memory Mushkin 512x2MB PC3200 Blueline
Video Card(s) Radeon 9800 pro iceQ
Storage Western Digital 250GB PATA
Display(s) Samsung 17"
Audio Device(s) AC97
Power Supply iCute
Software WindowsXP Pro SP2 32bit
W1zzard said:
usb flash drives have
- too little bandwidth to be fast enough
- access times between 10x faster to 10x slower than hdds
- LIMITED number of write cycles .. typically 100k
- way too high CPU usage on all implementations

yeah thanks 4 d info... I also though so, hmm dunno why they said it a lil faster when using it..
 
Joined
May 28, 2005
Messages
4,994 (0.72/day)
Location
South of England
System Name Box of Distraction
Processor Ryzen 7 1800X
Motherboard Crosshair VI Hero
Cooling Custom watercooling
Memory G.Skill TridentZ 2x8GB @ 3466MHz CL14 1T
Video Card(s) EVGA 1080Ti FE. WC'd & TDP limit increased to 360W.
Storage Samsung 960 Evo 500GB & WD Black 2TB storage drive.
Display(s) Asus ROG Swift PG278QR 27" 1440P 165hz Gsync
Case Phanteks Enthoo Pro M
Audio Device(s) Phillips Fidelio X2 headphones / basic Bose speakers
Power Supply EVGA Supernova 750W G3
Mouse Logitech G602
Keyboard Cherry MX Board 6.0 (mx red switches)
Software Win 10 & Linux Mint
Benchmark Scores https://hwbot.org/user/infrared
Alec§taar said:
I hate to "cross you" like this... but, it's fact:

No probs. I'm not always right :rolleyes:
 

Alec§taar

New Member
Joined
May 15, 2006
Messages
4,677 (0.71/day)
Location
Someone who's going to find NewTekie1 and teach hi
Processor DualCore AMD Athlon 64x2 4800+ (o/c 2801mhz STABLE (Ketxxx, POGE, Tatty One, ME))
Motherboard ASUS A8N-SLI Premium (PCIe x16, x4, x1)
Cooling PhaseChange Coolermaster CM754/939 (fan/heatsink), Thermalright heatspreaders + fan built on (RAM)
Memory 512mb PC-3200 DDR400 (set DDR-33 for o/c) by Corsair (matched pair, 2x256mb) 200.1/200mhz
Video Card(s) BFG GeForce 7900 GTX OC 512mb GDDR3 ram (o/c manually to 686 core/865 memory) - PhaseChange cooled
Storage Dual "Raptor X" 16mb 10krpm/RAID 0 Promise EX8350 x4 PCIe 128mb & Intel IO chip/CENATEK RocketDrive
Display(s) SONY 19" Trinitron MultiScan 400ps 1600x1200 75hz refresh 32-bit color
Case Antec Super-LanBoy (aluminum baby-tower w/ lower front & upper rear cooling exhaust fans)
Audio Device(s) RealTek AC97 onboard mobo stereo sound (Altec Lansing ACS-45 speakers - 10 yrs. still running!)
Power Supply Antec 500w ATX 2.0 "SmartPower" powersupply
Software Windows Server 2003 SP #1 fully patched, & massively tuned/tweaked to-the-max (plus latest drivers)
infrared said:
No probs. I'm not always right :rolleyes:

Neither am I!

Largely though on this one, you are in this one & perhaps for YOUR use-patterns! Fact is, you may never hit apps or data that cause this for you & are just unaware of exceptions in various apps (DanTheBanjoMan hits one RIGHT on the head in fact, see quote below).

(Don't knock what you said because it MOSTLY applies & for you, it may TOTALLY be right)

BUT, sooner or later?

It goes "BUST" & has to page...

DanTheBanjoman said:
And watch programs like photoshop not start anymore.

DanTheBanjoMan cited a PERFECT example & app that will cause this in fact, on the page prior to this one. He may have "hit this wall" before, & is noting it with a "lab practical" example thereof, of the point he & I are making is all.

It happens:

Especially if you are near limit on what you have loaded @ once programs & data-wise, OR you hit a particular app with HUGE memory requirements (e.g.-> Image editing progs, or even games) OR, the system diskcache has grown to a point where not much RAM is left for anything else... & it pages its content.

It's largely what Virtual Memory based Operating Systems are about really ("Swapping/Paging" to create the illusion of more RAM than you actually have, but I am sure you know this)!

However, if you NEVER hit that or see it? For you it works!

(I do know that Windows WILL "bitch" @ startup & say you lack a pagefile.sys though... & iirc, it forms a temporary one anyhow afaik when you lack one, to protect you against yourself)

APK

P.S.=> As-per-usual though, I have to state this "disclaimer": It all REALLY 'boils-down-to/distills-down-to' how you use your machine & w/ what apps... your use-patterns determine everything really! apk
 
Last edited:
Top