![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Moderator
|
Thermaltake W3
To read this review go to: http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/Thermaltake/W3/
Please Digg the review to help us promote it. Last edited by W1zzard; 09-07-2006 at 02:47 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
![]() |
One thing to note is that your setup could be affecting the results. @40C that temperature could be the final temperature of your idle cpu meaning that the liquid coolant is actually heating up the chipset at idle temperatures. One way to get better results is to set up a radiator between the cpu and the chipset thus to lower the temperature before it gets to the W3 waterblock.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Moderator
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
![]() Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Close to FrozenCPU.com
Posts: 477 (0.26/day)
Thanks: 8
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
|
good lord... halving flow rates and calling it not particularly restrictive? I'm sorry, but the difference in water block performance between .75 GPM (low, but still functional) and barely a third of a gallon per minute is massive, regardless of the loop. I don't care what waterblock you're using or what country you're in; .36 gpm is not functionally useable. Any block that can single-handedly halve the flowrates of an already-restrictive loop is positively monstrous.
@subject of CPU heating chipset: completely improbable unless your radiator is absurdly small with absurdly little airflow. Water-air deltas are usually in the 1-3 C range. CPU temp does not equate to water temp ![]()
__________________
“yeah i'm sorry .. i'm not so good at programming.. i just started” -W1zzard
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|