- Joined
- Feb 27, 2005
- Messages
- 179 (0.03/day)
Processor | Intel Core i7 6700K @ 4,8 GHz |
---|---|
Motherboard | Asus Z170 Pro Gaming |
Cooling | Alpenfön Brocken 2 |
Memory | 32 GB G.Skill DDR4-3000 |
Video Card(s) | Asus DirectCU II R290 |
Storage | 1 TB HD + 180 GB SSD + 500 GB SSD |
Display(s) | Philips BDM4065 39,95" Ultra-HD |
Case | Antec P280 |
Audio Device(s) | Onboard HD sound on 5.1 system |
Power Supply | Silverstone SST-ST85F-GS Strider Gold Series - 850 Watt |
Software | Windows 10 Pro x64 |
Let me say first, this was all done on Windows Vista x64 with the Nvidia 100.59 drivers, so it's probably not comparable to XP results. The scores could be lower because of the mature XP drivers and the beta status of the Vista ones. But that's not the point anyway, I was just measuring performance increases with different settings. RAM timings haven't been changed during the tests and the gfx card fan was set to 100% with nTune.
I didn't bother to make benchmarks with stock CPU settings
Setting 1: E6400 @ 3.2 Ghz (8x400) + 8800GTX stock 575/1350/1800
3DMark 06: 10750 (=100%)
3DMark 03: 34921 (=100%)
Setting 2: E6400 @ 3.2 Ghz (8x400) + 8800GTX 625/1550/1900
3DMark 06: 11430 (=106.33%)
3DMark 03: 37371 (=107.22%)
Setting 3: E6400 @ 3.2 Ghz (8x400) + 8800GTX 625/1550/2000
3DMark 06: 11539 (=107.34%)
3DMark 03: 37810 (=108.27%)
That is as far as I overclocked my 8800GTX, the core may have a couple of Mhz more in it, but I stopped there. Then I increased the FSB and thus made the CPU and the RAM faster.
Setting 4: E6400 @ 3.4 Ghz (8x425) + 8800GTX 625/1550/2000
3DMark 06: 11769 (=109.48%)
3DMark 03: 38324 (=109.74%)
Setting 5: E6400 @ 3.6 Ghz (8x450) + 8800GTX 625/1550/2000
3DMark 06: 11910 (=110.79%)
3DMark 03: 38537 (=110.35%)
I have more detailed data as well, but I will put that in some kind of article. Just thought you might be interested in these raw results. When my Q6600 arrives, I will run more benchmarks and then put them in my article.
Edit: Ok ok ok, you asked me to go for 12k...
Setting 6: E6400 @ 3.6 Ghz (8x450) + 8800GTZ 650/1550/2000
3DMark 06: 12129 (=112.83%)
3DMark 03: 39444 (=112.95%)
Now don't ask me and try to get 40k at 3DMark03...
I didn't bother to make benchmarks with stock CPU settings
Setting 1: E6400 @ 3.2 Ghz (8x400) + 8800GTX stock 575/1350/1800
3DMark 06: 10750 (=100%)
3DMark 03: 34921 (=100%)
Setting 2: E6400 @ 3.2 Ghz (8x400) + 8800GTX 625/1550/1900
3DMark 06: 11430 (=106.33%)
3DMark 03: 37371 (=107.22%)
Setting 3: E6400 @ 3.2 Ghz (8x400) + 8800GTX 625/1550/2000
3DMark 06: 11539 (=107.34%)
3DMark 03: 37810 (=108.27%)
That is as far as I overclocked my 8800GTX, the core may have a couple of Mhz more in it, but I stopped there. Then I increased the FSB and thus made the CPU and the RAM faster.
Setting 4: E6400 @ 3.4 Ghz (8x425) + 8800GTX 625/1550/2000
3DMark 06: 11769 (=109.48%)
3DMark 03: 38324 (=109.74%)
Setting 5: E6400 @ 3.6 Ghz (8x450) + 8800GTX 625/1550/2000
3DMark 06: 11910 (=110.79%)
3DMark 03: 38537 (=110.35%)
I have more detailed data as well, but I will put that in some kind of article. Just thought you might be interested in these raw results. When my Q6600 arrives, I will run more benchmarks and then put them in my article.
Edit: Ok ok ok, you asked me to go for 12k...
Setting 6: E6400 @ 3.6 Ghz (8x450) + 8800GTZ 650/1550/2000
3DMark 06: 12129 (=112.83%)
3DMark 03: 39444 (=112.95%)
Now don't ask me and try to get 40k at 3DMark03...
Last edited: