Alec§taar
New Member
- Joined
- May 15, 2006
- Messages
- 4,677 (0.71/day)
- Location
- Someone who's going to find NewTekie1 and teach hi
Processor | DualCore AMD Athlon 64x2 4800+ (o/c 2801mhz STABLE (Ketxxx, POGE, Tatty One, ME)) |
---|---|
Motherboard | ASUS A8N-SLI Premium (PCIe x16, x4, x1) |
Cooling | PhaseChange Coolermaster CM754/939 (fan/heatsink), Thermalright heatspreaders + fan built on (RAM) |
Memory | 512mb PC-3200 DDR400 (set DDR-33 for o/c) by Corsair (matched pair, 2x256mb) 200.1/200mhz |
Video Card(s) | BFG GeForce 7900 GTX OC 512mb GDDR3 ram (o/c manually to 686 core/865 memory) - PhaseChange cooled |
Storage | Dual "Raptor X" 16mb 10krpm/RAID 0 Promise EX8350 x4 PCIe 128mb & Intel IO chip/CENATEK RocketDrive |
Display(s) | SONY 19" Trinitron MultiScan 400ps 1600x1200 75hz refresh 32-bit color |
Case | Antec Super-LanBoy (aluminum baby-tower w/ lower front & upper rear cooling exhaust fans) |
Audio Device(s) | RealTek AC97 onboard mobo stereo sound (Altec Lansing ACS-45 speakers - 10 yrs. still running!) |
Power Supply | Antec 500w ATX 2.0 "SmartPower" powersupply |
Software | Windows Server 2003 SP #1 fully patched, & massively tuned/tweaked to-the-max (plus latest drivers) |
Starting to do an analysis of Norton AntiVirus Corporate Edition 10.2, vs. NOD32 version 2085, in terms of memory usage for ALL of their parts (both GUI interfaces for resident scanning, & also their component services).
I am using the most current model of Microsoft Process Explorer to do so.
(At this point, we know from other threads, that NAV is better detecting MACRO virus, while NOD32 is better @ all other types, in a nutshell... per tests we've seen here & posted about in other threads - if you can show contrary data to that, fine, but it's what I saw & so did you where we discussed this before).
This is about how much each one EATS in terms of memory, so I'll be back w/ screenshots of each process & do the math for them as well, so we FINALLY can 'get to the bottom of this' lol, per my promise to do so!
* Ought to be interesting!
APK
P.S.=> A cool thing resulted from this by the way: These 2 products for AntiVirus protection DO NOT "FIGHT IN RAM", which is excellent!
Well, thusfar @ least (well, probably not until I go to try to click on an executable in Explorer.exe & start it up etc. because that's when resident antivirus programs go to work, but so far, I have done more than a few of those, & all is well)...
Anyhow/anyways, to that I say: "BONUS!"
So, that all said & aside? brb w/ the screenshots!
(Next, I am going to write BELARC today about their security analysis tool, & find out why it is taking shots @ my score of 5.00/10 possible after THIS is done!)... apk
I am using the most current model of Microsoft Process Explorer to do so.
(At this point, we know from other threads, that NAV is better detecting MACRO virus, while NOD32 is better @ all other types, in a nutshell... per tests we've seen here & posted about in other threads - if you can show contrary data to that, fine, but it's what I saw & so did you where we discussed this before).
This is about how much each one EATS in terms of memory, so I'll be back w/ screenshots of each process & do the math for them as well, so we FINALLY can 'get to the bottom of this' lol, per my promise to do so!
* Ought to be interesting!
APK
P.S.=> A cool thing resulted from this by the way: These 2 products for AntiVirus protection DO NOT "FIGHT IN RAM", which is excellent!
Well, thusfar @ least (well, probably not until I go to try to click on an executable in Explorer.exe & start it up etc. because that's when resident antivirus programs go to work, but so far, I have done more than a few of those, & all is well)...
Anyhow/anyways, to that I say: "BONUS!"
So, that all said & aside? brb w/ the screenshots!
(Next, I am going to write BELARC today about their security analysis tool, & find out why it is taking shots @ my score of 5.00/10 possible after THIS is done!)... apk