• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Core 2 E6400 vs. Xeon 3050

Joined
Dec 6, 2005
Messages
10,881 (1.62/day)
Location
Manchester, NH
System Name Senile
Processor I7-4790K@4.8 GHz 24/7
Motherboard MSI Z97-G45 Gaming
Cooling Be Quiet Pure Rock Air
Memory 16GB 4x4 G.Skill CAS9 2133 Sniper
Video Card(s) GIGABYTE Vega 64
Storage Samsung EVO 500GB / 8 Different WDs / QNAP TS-253 8GB NAS with 2x10Tb WD Blue
Display(s) 34" LG 34CB88-P 21:9 Curved UltraWide QHD (3440*1440) *FREE_SYNC*
Case Rosewill
Audio Device(s) Onboard + HD HDMI
Power Supply Corsair HX750
Mouse Logitech G5
Keyboard Corsair Strafe RGB & G610 Orion Red
Software Win 10
Is there anything particularly special aboout 65nm Xeon chips vs. 65nm Core 2 chips? Obviously, there are chips with different FSB and L2 Cache, Dual vs. Quad cores... but when they are equal, and same mfg technology, what differentiates them???

Like these:

"Intel Core 2 Duo E6400 Conroe 2.13GHz 2M shared L2 Cache LGA 775 Processor - Retail"
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819115004

"Intel Xeon 3050 Conroe 2.13GHz 2M shared L2 Cache LGA 775 Processor - Retail"
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819117103

The Xeon costs $1.99 more - that's all I can tell. It's also apparent overall that Intel drives the Xeons into the "server" market.
 

hat

Enthusiast
Joined
Nov 20, 2006
Messages
21,731 (3.41/day)
Location
Ohio
System Name Starlifter :: Dragonfly
Processor i7 2600k 4.4GHz :: i5 10400
Motherboard ASUS P8P67 Pro :: ASUS Prime H570-Plus
Cooling Cryorig M9 :: Stock
Memory 4x4GB DDR3 2133 :: 2x8GB DDR4 2400
Video Card(s) PNY GTX1070 :: Integrated UHD 630
Storage Crucial MX500 1TB, 2x1TB Seagate RAID 0 :: Mushkin Enhanced 60GB SSD, 3x4TB Seagate HDD RAID5
Display(s) Onn 165hz 1080p :: Acer 1080p
Case Antec SOHO 1030B :: Old White Full Tower
Audio Device(s) Creative X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty Pro - Bose Companion 2 Series III :: None
Power Supply FSP Hydro GE 550w :: EVGA Supernova 550
Software Windows 10 Pro - Plex Server on Dragonfly
Benchmark Scores >9000
Buying a Xeon over a Core 2 Duo would be like buying an Opteron over a regular AMD chip. No difference at stock, but the Xeon is a server-grade chip which is made out of higher-grade materials and can take more heat than a regular processor, thus allowing a higher overclock. Ask some of the opty ownere here, they will tell you. And dan too.
 
Joined
Dec 6, 2005
Messages
10,881 (1.62/day)
Location
Manchester, NH
System Name Senile
Processor I7-4790K@4.8 GHz 24/7
Motherboard MSI Z97-G45 Gaming
Cooling Be Quiet Pure Rock Air
Memory 16GB 4x4 G.Skill CAS9 2133 Sniper
Video Card(s) GIGABYTE Vega 64
Storage Samsung EVO 500GB / 8 Different WDs / QNAP TS-253 8GB NAS with 2x10Tb WD Blue
Display(s) 34" LG 34CB88-P 21:9 Curved UltraWide QHD (3440*1440) *FREE_SYNC*
Case Rosewill
Audio Device(s) Onboard + HD HDMI
Power Supply Corsair HX750
Mouse Logitech G5
Keyboard Corsair Strafe RGB & G610 Orion Red
Software Win 10
the Xeon is a server-grade chip which is made out of higher-grade materials and can take more heat than a regular processor, thus allowing a higher overclock.

Hmm... same core, same fab (presumably). Possible, but I was thinking it was more marketing, like selling the 2900 v.s a FireGL "workstation" card.
 

newtekie1

Semi-Retired Folder
Joined
Nov 22, 2005
Messages
28,472 (4.23/day)
Location
Indiana, USA
Processor Intel Core i7 10850K@5.2GHz
Motherboard AsRock Z470 Taichi
Cooling Corsair H115i Pro w/ Noctua NF-A14 Fans
Memory 32GB DDR4-3600
Video Card(s) RTX 2070 Super
Storage 500GB SX8200 Pro + 8TB with 1TB SSD Cache
Display(s) Acer Nitro VG280K 4K 28"
Case Fractal Design Define S
Audio Device(s) Onboard is good enough for me
Power Supply eVGA SuperNOVA 1000w G3
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
Marketing is a big factor.

However, usually the server grade chips are binned slightly higher than the regular desktop chips. This is really just a matter of Intel/AMD making sure the chips will last under the most extreme workloads and in the most extreme environments. I've seen companies sticking netburst 90nm Xeons in 1U servers with tiny passive heatsinks running the processors at 80% load minimum at all times and the processors are expected to survive. Situations like that are why Intel binns the chips slightly higher.

Does this mean you are guaranteed a better overclock? No, not really. But it pushes the odds in your favor a little bit.
 
Top