|
| The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to cefurkan For This Useful Post: |
10-21-2007, 03:01 AM
|
#2 |
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,338 (0.82/day)
Thanks: 33
Thanked 38 Times in 37 Posts
 |
Using that processor really bottlenekcs the gpu though but it really shows the difference of the two cards. Nice.
__________________
“If you don't like the 2900, that's fine, but quit coming into every 2900 thread you see, just to downtalk it. That's called trolling.”
|
|
|
|
10-21-2007, 03:03 AM
|
#3 | |
 |
Quote:
it is faster than all dual core cpus at the market(of course default values) 3195 mhz and i dont thinks so higher values make much difference expect 3d mark tests  |
|
|
|
|
|
10-21-2007, 03:54 AM
|
#4 |
|
Eligible for custom title
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Kingdom of gods
Posts: 6,384 (4.70/day)
Thanks: 35
Thanked 566 Times in 409 Posts
|
Use the highest possible stable FSB, that will reduce bottlenecks to a minimum.
__________________
WARNING: I am cracking down on stupidity in the forums. Anyone caught making a dumb statement clearly not knowing many, if any of the facts, will promptly be directed to xtremesystems. Sig edited. If anyone wants to know about the E4400 (E7200 sold) drop me a PM |
|
|
|
|
10-21-2007, 07:56 PM
|
#5 |
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Here For Now, Somewhere Else Later
Posts: 1 (0.00/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Was there a reason for not testing the ATI card at same higher CPU core speed as the Nvidia card (as shown in your first set of pics)?
|
|
|
|
|
10-21-2007, 08:42 PM
|
#6 | |
|
|
Quote:
but if u look the 3d mark scores u see the cpu scores same |
|
|
|
|
|
10-21-2007, 08:49 PM
|
#7 |
|
Staff
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Washington & Jefferson College - Biochemistry
Posts: 4,195 (3.87/day)
Thanks: 380
Thanked 460 Times in 417 Posts
 |
doesn't matter that the cpu scored the same, that was solely on the cpu tests, it was still most likely bottlenecking at least at times during the graphics tests
the first thing I noticed with this test as well was the processor, the reason to use a very high end processor in comparisons such as these is to attempt to make the test as objective as possible, reducing the possibility of a cpu bottleneck to as close to nil as possible therefore using a highly overclocked quad core for a comparison like this would've been the most favorable choice |
|
|
|
|
10-21-2007, 09:02 PM
|
#8 | |
|
|
Quote:
i dont think so it wont make much more difference beacuse most of the games cant use quad core very well |
|
|
|
|
|
10-21-2007, 09:33 PM
|
#9 |
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Central Illinois
Posts: 1,711 (1.04/day)
Thanks: 471
Thanked 229 Times in 199 Posts
|
He has a point
__________________
Wilson-1996-2009 RIP My best friend ever. 
|
|
|
|
|
10-21-2007, 09:34 PM
|
#10 | |
|
Staff
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Washington & Jefferson College - Biochemistry
Posts: 4,195 (3.87/day)
Thanks: 380
Thanked 460 Times in 417 Posts
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
10-21-2007, 10:07 PM
|
#11 |
|
|
Interesting and good work.
I've been asking for a comparison akin to this for the HD 2900XT and the GTS 640Mb for sometime. There are plenty of reviews out there that compare the two cards and not at their max air OC. |
|
|
|
|
10-21-2007, 10:27 PM
|
#12 |
|
|
those tests made at stok coolings
|
|
|
|
|
10-21-2007, 10:31 PM
|
#13 |
 |
Thank you, I've been waiting for this type of benchmark. :-)
And, to all the bashers, what the hell.. He said "made by me", and this does reflect a real world test at least, so what is with all the hate? It shows that with this processor at these settings, this is what you can expect, and that the 8800 GTS oc outperforms the 2900 pro at least at this level. |
|
|
|
|
10-21-2007, 10:44 PM
|
#14 | |
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 115 (0.14/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
You misread something.. His 8800 GTS is not a 640 mb card. It's the 320 mb card. So the 8800 GTS OC 320 mb card has a disadvantage, less memory on the card.
Quote:
__________________
AMD Opteron 185 2.8 l eVGA NForce4 l eVGA GTX 260 216 l BFG 9800 GT 1 gig PhysX l Corsair XMS 4 gig PC3200 l WD Raptor X l WD 2 x 1 TB l X-Fi Xtreme Gamer l Antec Trio 650W l Windows Vista Ultimate Edition 64 bit l 2 X Dell E248WFP 24" Monitors
|
|
|
|
|
10-21-2007, 11:27 PM
|
#15 |
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: C:\Program Files (x86)\Aphexdreamer\
Posts: 2,969 (3.34/day)
Thanks: 337
Thanked 299 Times in 268 Posts
|
The HD2900 Pro Is being majorly bottelnecked, the higher the clock of the cpu, the better the performance of the HD2900 Pro. Also you can overclock the HD2900 Pro a lot more depending on the clock speed of your CPU. So although I am glad the two are being compared, I don't think its fair having the HD2900 Pro running with a 1.8Ghz(2) processor.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
10-21-2007, 11:59 PM
|
#16 |
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 639 (0.38/day)
Thanks: 4
Thanked 17 Times in 14 Posts
|
Very nice effort, I truely mean that. But the higher the CPU overclock, the better the benchmark scores, period. I also agree that these cards are not meant for low end CPU's and just get faster and faster with higher clocks.
|
|
|
|
|
10-22-2007, 12:21 AM
|
#17 |
|
Eligible for custom title
|
Here is a bench for you can your 8800 gts 320 match this.
  just kidding of course This just goes to show you how much a GPU depends on the CPU My gpu was at 870/2380 stable 24/7
__________________
A very good power supply calculator http://www.extreme.outervision.com/p...ulatorlite.jsp |
|
|
|
|
10-22-2007, 01:42 AM
|
#18 |
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: England
Posts: 829 (0.63/day)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 42 Times in 39 Posts
|
Ignore most of these people, this is a very useful and thorough comparison.
For all of you complaining about the CPU, you're all full of shit! A 3.2ghz C2D will not "bottleneck" these upper-mid-range cards. This comparison is completely valid and very useful. Thanks for your contribution cefurkan! |
|
|
|
|
10-22-2007, 01:49 AM
|
#19 |
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: C:\Program Files (x86)\Aphexdreamer\
Posts: 2,969 (3.34/day)
Thanks: 337
Thanked 299 Times in 268 Posts
|
Man I'm just confused why he has his CPU at 3.1ghz with the Nvidia and with the ATI he has 2.1ghz. Unless I am reading those pics wrong I don't get that. Also don't get me wrong I am not trying to dis this guy or anyone else, just that I want it to be accurate thats all.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
10-22-2007, 01:54 AM
|
#20 | |
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: England
Posts: 829 (0.63/day)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 42 Times in 39 Posts
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
10-22-2007, 01:54 AM
|
#21 | |
|
Knows what makes you tick
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: DFW/ Texas
Posts: 5,536 (3.96/day)
Thanks: 598
Thanked 706 Times in 565 Posts
 |
Quote:
__________________
Core 2 Duo Overclocking guide Athlon 64 overclocking guide “If I were to do this, it'd be my luck that the door would rip off the hinges, burst into flames, and rape my face with fiery hot death.” -El Fiendo
|
|
|
|
|
|
10-22-2007, 01:59 AM
|
#22 | |
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: England
Posts: 829 (0.63/day)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 42 Times in 39 Posts
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
10-22-2007, 02:25 AM
|
#23 | |
|
Knows what makes you tick
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: DFW/ Texas
Posts: 5,536 (3.96/day)
Thanks: 598
Thanked 706 Times in 565 Posts
|
Quote:
__________________
Core 2 Duo Overclocking guide Athlon 64 overclocking guide “If I were to do this, it'd be my luck that the door would rip off the hinges, burst into flames, and rape my face with fiery hot death.” -El Fiendo
|
|
|
|
|
|
10-22-2007, 02:27 AM
|
#24 | |
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: C:\Program Files (x86)\Aphexdreamer\
Posts: 2,969 (3.34/day)
Thanks: 337
Thanked 299 Times in 268 Posts
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
10-22-2007, 02:34 AM
|
#25 | |
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: England
Posts: 829 (0.63/day)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 42 Times in 39 Posts
|
Quote:
That, by the by, was sarcasm. What are you on? |
|
|
|
|
 |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
System Specs
