Crysis benchmark tool

cefurkan · Nov 23, 2007

The tool provides a robust front-end to benchmark Crysis. It provides the ability to queue up many runs and will provide detailed results for each test as well as an overall summary with accurate averages. The first and foremost goals were simplicity and reliability in the tool and in the benchmark scores. Works with retail and demo.

download link

http://downloads.guru3d.com/download.php?det=1791

here is the result of 8800gt with original cfg files
avg fps 33,03

trog100 · Nov 23, 2007

nice one.. the old way was a pain in the ass.. gonna have a play..

trog

cefurkan · Nov 23, 2007

with xp mod
all settings very high
no af no aa

casper250c · Nov 23, 2007

I'm only on a 1950 Pro but damn I expected a little better result that I got :mad:

EastCoasthandle · Nov 23, 2007

I really am skeptical about cefurkan results. A little digging around and found these scores from others with GTs OC'd

Nice gstavo!!!

I guess I'll be the 2nd to post smile

My PC Specs:
Windows XP Pro
AMD Opteron 148 @ 2.8Ghz
1 GB PC3200 Ram
BFG 8800 GT OC (625 Core/1800 Memory) with Forceware 169.09 beta drivers

The following benchmarks are taken from the Crysis Benchmarking Tool:

11/17/2007 12:52:59 AM - XP
Beginning Run #1 on Map-island, Demo-benchmark_gpu
DX9 1280x1024, AA=4x, Vsync=Disabled, 32 bit test, FullScreen
Demo Loops=3, Time Of Day= 9
Global Game Quality: High
==============================================================
TimeDemo Play Started , (Total Frames: 2000, Recorded Time: 111.86s)
!TimeDemo Run 0 Finished.
Play Time: 111.71s, Average FPS: 17.90
Min FPS: 0.00 at frame 136, Max FPS: 32.70 at frame 896
Average Tri/Sec: 18206414, Tri/Frame: 1016903
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 0.90
!TimeDemo Run 1 Finished.
Play Time: 69.36s, Average FPS: 28.83
Min FPS: 0.00 at frame 136, Max FPS: 34.69 at frame 980
Average Tri/Sec: 29638484, Tri/Frame: 1027925
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 0.89
!TimeDemo Run 2 Finished.
Play Time: 68.63s, Average FPS: 29.14
Min FPS: 0.00 at frame 136, Max FPS: 35.28 at frame 984
Average Tri/Sec: 29959762, Tri/Frame: 1028097
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 0.89
TimeDemo Play Ended, (3 Runs Performed)
==============================================================

Completed All Tests

<><><><><><><><><><><><><>>--SUMMARY--<<><><><><><><><><><><><><>

11/17/2007 12:52:59 AM - XP
Run #1- DX9 1280x1024 AA=4x, 32 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 28.985

Post 17
using 1280x1024 with 4xAA. Also take note of min frame rate. With min frame rates that low it's going to be very choppy/stuttery experience.

With no AA this person only gained 5 FPS more

Beginning Run #1 on Map-island, Demo-benchmark_gpu
DX9 1280x1024, AA=4x, Vsync=Disabled, 32 bit test, FullScreen
Demo Loops=3, Time Of Day= 9
Global Game Quality: High

TimeDemo Play Started , (Total Frames: 2000, Recorded Time: 111.86s)
!TimeDemo Run 0 Finished.
Play Time: 119.80s, Average FPS: 16.69
Min FPS: 0.51 at frame 138, Max FPS: 34.14 at frame 888
Average Tri/Sec: 17200494, Tri/Frame: 1030300
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 0.89
!TimeDemo Run 1 Finished.
Play Time: 63.76s, Average FPS: 31.37
Min FPS: 0.51 at frame 138, Max FPS: 36.66 at frame 982
Average Tri/Sec: 32673274, Tri/Frame: 1041637
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 0.88
!TimeDemo Run 2 Finished.
Play Time: 63.04s, Average FPS: 31.73
Min FPS: 0.51 at frame 138, Max FPS: 38.76 at frame 1001
Average Tri/Sec: 33016680, Tri/Frame: 1040696
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 0.88
!TimeDemo Run 3 Finished.
Play Time: 62.85s, Average FPS: 31.82
Min FPS: 0.51 at frame 138, Max FPS: 38.76 at frame 1001
Average Tri/Sec: 33135788, Tri/Frame: 1041277
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 0.88
TimeDemo Play Ended, (4 Runs Performed)
===========================================

Post 21

The results just above are at 1280x1024 with 4x AA.
As you can see, this user with a nice OC wasn't able to reach any where near 33 FPS at 1280x1024 with 4xAA. Even if you OC the GT until its unstable shouldn't gain the extra 5 FPS needed. Why? Because the GT is bandwidth limited and even though it scores are higher without AA takes a massive hit when AA is enabled.

Here is the results without AA
11/17/2007 9:19:26 AM - XP
Beginning Run #1 on Map-island, Demo-benchmark_gpu
DX9 1280x1024, AA=No AA, Vsync=Disabled, 32 bit test, FullScreen
Demo Loops=3, Time Of Day= 9
Global Game Quality: High
==============================================================
TimeDemo Play Started , (Total Frames: 2000, Recorded Time: 111.86s)
!TimeDemo Run 0 Finished.
Play Time: 107.66s, Average FPS: 18.58
Min FPS: 0.00 at frame 137, Max FPS: 39.29 at frame 976
Average Tri/Sec: 18298080, Tri/Frame: 984972
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 0.93
!TimeDemo Run 1 Finished.
Play Time: 57.46s, Average FPS: 34.81
Min FPS: 0.00 at frame 137, Max FPS: 46.57 at frame 1004
Average Tri/Sec: 34620024, Tri/Frame: 994679
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 0.92
!TimeDemo Run 2 Finished.
Play Time: 57.61s, Average FPS: 34.72
Min FPS: 0.00 at frame 137, Max FPS: 46.57 at frame 1004
Average Tri/Sec: 34593000, Tri/Frame: 996485
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 0.92
TimeDemo Play Ended, (3 Runs Performed)
==============================================================

Completed All Tests

<><><><><><><><><><><><><>>--SUMMARY--<<><><><><><><><><><><><><>

11/17/2007 9:19:26 AM - XP
Run #1- DX9 1280x1024 AA=No AA, 32 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 34.765

This is found in the same post but I wanted to dissect it to show you what I beleive is an honest benchmark result. As you can see, this person with a GT is getting roughly 1 FPS better then cefurkan without AA. This should tell you something is not right with his results.

I have seen similar results from others who have OC'd GT with 1280 4xAA and it's no where near 33 FPS! Again look at the min FPS results posted in this post. As you can see they are very low even though a GT can obtain very high FPS. Question: Doesn't those low min fps look fimilar? It should, it's the similar results from the iax-tech review (which was release before any other official review of the HD 3870).
Have a look here. This validates the posters results which I have quoted.

{JNT}Raptor · Nov 23, 2007

Heres mine.

EastCoasthandle · Nov 23, 2007

Here are mine

cefurkan · Nov 23, 2007

EastCoasthandle said:
I really am skeptical about cefurkan results. A little digging around and found these scores from others with GTs OC'd

Post 17
using 1280x1024 with 4xAA. Also take note of min frame rate. With min frame rates that low it's going to be very choppy/stuttery experience.

With no AA this person only gained 5 FPS more

Post 21

The results just above are at 1280x1024 with 4x AA.
As you can see, this user with a nice OC wasn't able to reach any where near 33 FPS at 1280x1024 with 4xAA. Even if you OC the GT until its unstable shouldn't gain the extra 5 FPS needed. Why? Because the GT is bandwidth limited and even though it scores are higher without AA takes a massive hit when AA is enabled.

This is found in the same post but I wanted to dissect it to show you what I beleive is an honest benchmark result. As you can see, this person with a GT is getting roughly 1 FPS better then cefurkan without AA. This should tell you something is not right with his results.

I have seen similar results from others who have OC'd GT with 1280 4xAA and it's no where near 33 FPS! Again look at the min FPS results posted in this post. As you can see they are very low even though a GT can obtain very high FPS. Question: Doesn't those low min fps look fimilar? It should, it's the similar results from the iax-tech review (which was release before any other official review of the HD 3870).
Have a look here. This validates the posters results which I have quoted.

i think u are a retard

EastCoasthandle said:
Nice gstavo!!!

I guess I'll be the 2nd to post smile

My PC Specs:
Windows XP Pro
AMD Opteron 148 @ 2.8Ghz
1 GB PC3200 Ram
BFG 8800 GT OC (625 Core/1800 Memory) with Forceware 169.09 beta drivers

The following benchmarks are taken from the Crysis Benchmarking Tool:

11/17/2007 12:52:59 AM - XP
Beginning Run #1 on Map-island, Demo-benchmark_gpu
DX9 1280x1024, AA=4x, Vsync=Disabled, 32 bit test, FullScreen
Demo Loops=3, Time Of Day= 9
Global Game Quality: High
================================================== ============
TimeDemo Play Started , (Total Frames: 2000, Recorded Time: 111.86s)
!TimeDemo Run 0 Finished.
Play Time: 111.71s, Average FPS: 17.90
Min FPS: 0.00 at frame 136, Max FPS: 32.70 at frame 896
Average Tri/Sec: 18206414, Tri/Frame: 1016903
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 0.90
!TimeDemo Run 1 Finished.
Play Time: 69.36s, Average FPS: 28.83
Min FPS: 0.00 at frame 136, Max FPS: 34.69 at frame 980
Average Tri/Sec: 29638484, Tri/Frame: 1027925
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 0.89
!TimeDemo Run 2 Finished.
Play Time: 68.63s, Average FPS: 29.14
Min FPS: 0.00 at frame 136, Max FPS: 35.28 at frame 984
Average Tri/Sec: 29959762, Tri/Frame: 1028097
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 0.89
TimeDemo Play Ended, (3 Runs Performed)
================================================== ============

Completed All Tests

<><><><><><><><><><><><><>>--SUMMARY--<<><><><><><><><><><><><><>

11/17/2007 12:52:59 AM - XP
Run #1- DX9 1280x1024 AA=4x, 32 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 28.985

mine is

720/1728/999

also my cpu is more powerfull
my ram is
900 mhz 4.4.4.12.34 latency[

but i understand ur pain when i look ur system specs

EastCoasthandle · Nov 23, 2007

cefurkan said:
i think u are a retard

mine is

720/1728/999

also my cpu is more powerfull
my ram is
900 mhz 4.4.4.12.34 latency[

but i understand ur pain when i look ur system specs

CPU makes very little difference in Crysis you should know that by now. Also, your GPU overclock doesn't explain the scores I've seen at similar OC's. Also, there is that tailing issue with bandwidth limit when 4xAA is applied. Therefore, doesn't explain your score. Your lack of explanation is beginning to show your frustration. Finally, I am not retarded because I find discrepancies with your results ever since you started posting them.

but be my guest and post your results without AA.

cefurkan · Nov 23, 2007

EastCoasthandle said:
CPU makes very little difference in Crysis you should know that by now. Also, your GPU overclock doesn't explain the scores I've seen at similar OC's. Also, there is that tailing issue with bandwidth limit when 4xAA is applied. Therefore, doesn't explain your score. Your lack of explanation is beginning to show your frustration. Finally, I am not retarded because I find discrepancies with your results ever since you started posting them.

but be my guest and post your results without AA.

i know cpu makes little difference

but both memory ram mhz and timings

also

gpu and graphic card memory frequancies makes huge difference

but dont worry i understand ur pain :laugh:

and wait gonna post without aa results

EastCoasthandle · Nov 23, 2007

cefurkan said:
i know cpu makes little difference

but both memory ram mhz and timings

also

gpu and graphic card memory frequancies makes huge difference

but dont worry i understand ur pain

and wait gonna post without aa results

Post your results without AA, baiting with me to argue won't win you any points. Also, if you knew CPU makes little difference it made no sense for you to suggest it in your previous post.

{JNT}Raptor · Nov 23, 2007

I just ran It again with 4x AA

Strange Indeed. :rockout:

EastCoasthandle · Nov 23, 2007

{JNT}Raptor said:
I just ran It again with 4x AA

Strange Indeed.

You are at 760 (745 in your previous post) @ 1803 shader and he is at 720 @ 1728 shader and he gets the same score? It's very unlikely that he should be getting the exact same score :nutkick:

Which actually proves my point about his benchmark results :toast:

cefurkan · Nov 23, 2007

EastCoasthandle said:
Post your results without AA, baiting with me to argue won't win you any points. Also, if you knew CPU makes little difference it made no sense for you to suggest it in your previous post.

but still it makes difference

here is the result without aa

lets see ur 4x aa result

EastCoasthandle · Nov 23, 2007

cefurkan said:
but still it makes difference

here is the result without aa

lets see ur 4x aa result

You've been disproven enough. The evidence found in this thread makes it obvious now! :toast:

cefurkan · Nov 23, 2007

EastCoasthandle said:
You've been disproven enough. The evidence found in this thread makes it obvious now!

i bet that u cant get more than 25+ fps with 4x aa

ok ok np

ur pain is big
these are normal behaviours for you

EastCoasthandle · Nov 23, 2007

cefurkan said:
i bet that u cant get more than 25+ fps with 4x aa

ok ok np

ur pain is big
these are normal behaviours for you

It's obvious that you aren't willing to address why you were able to get similar results with lower GPU/shader clock rate :roll:

This solidifies your results as questionable. And, by your willingness to bait me to argue to side track the issue only further proves my point about your results.

cefurkan · Nov 24, 2007

EastCoasthandle said:
It's obvious that you aren't willing to address why you were able to get similar results with lower GPU/shader clock rate This solidifies your results as questionable. And, by your willingness to bait me to argue to side track the issue only further proves my point about your results.

u are damn moron

there could be countless reason

his cpu is amd
his ram timings is not known
his windows may be corrupted or anything else
he may have virus or etc

also they are not same he has +0.5 fps more

his graphic card memory is 100 mhz lower than mine

u dont know anything about hardware and just talk unintelligibly

cefurkan · Nov 24, 2007

also i use win xp sp3 beta

EastCoasthandle · Nov 24, 2007

Lets look at the results so far:
JNT: 44.85 at 1280 without aa
JNT: 33.67 at 1280 with 4xAA
760/1800

Cerfurkan: 44.06 at 1280 without AA
Cerfurkan: 33.03 at 1280 with 4xAA
720/1728

JNT beat you with a lower end CPU as well now you tell me. How can you get results similar to JNT with a lower gpu clock and shader clock :wtf:

SP3 gave you OC results similar to 760/1728 :wtf:

:shadedshu Come on man, you running out of excuses here!

Again, with the name calling to side track the issue. I told you before, calling me names will not derail the issue at hand. Look at it this way, I am sure those who have a GT would like to know how is it you an obtain these kind of results without the massive OC that JNT has

cefurkan · Nov 24, 2007

EastCoasthandle said:
Lets look at the results so far:
JNT: 44.85 at 1280 without aa
JNT: 33.67 at 1280 with 4xAA
760/1800

Cerfurkan: 44.06 at 1280 without AA
Cerfurkan: 33.03 at 1280 with 4xAA
720/1728

JNT beat you with a lower end CPU as well now you tell me. How can you get results similar to JNT with a lower gpu clock and shader clock

SP3 gave you OC results similar to 760/1728 :shadedshu Come on man, you running out of excuses here!

instead off talking nonesensely

just put here ur 4x aa result

EastCoasthandle · Nov 24, 2007

cefurkan said:
instead off talking nonesensely

just put here ur 4x aa result

Answer my question and stop trying to derail the issue. You created this thread and after further observations from another GT user with a much higher OC the results don't jive!

Xaser04 · Nov 24, 2007

cefurkan said:
with xp mod
all settings very high
no af no aa

Your settings are high not very high.

cefurkan · Nov 24, 2007

EastCoasthandle said:
Answer my question and stop trying to derail the issue. You created this thread and after further observations from another GT user with a much higher OC the results don't jive!

i swear u are ignorant

u are an empty bottle

i say u that cpu ram motherboard
Os

all of these makes difference

but since u are a moron

u still dont get what i mean

but dont worry every user who has a little bit info about computers understand what i mean

and i am asking u

why u are so blind to see his graphic card memory mhz is 100 mhz lower than mine

EastCoasthandle · Nov 24, 2007

Xaser04 said:
Your settings are high not very high.

What he's suggesting is that he modified Crysis files to make it very high using DX9 instead of DX10. Those modification will not show up on any benchmark result because it's only intended for HIGH. Now all I can tell you is to believe what you want when he says he's getting those results at VERY HIGH SETTINGS! :wtf:

Processor	Q6600 2.4 GHZ@ 3.754 GHZ
Motherboard	Asus P5Q
Cooling	stok fan
Memory	4 GBYT DDR2 CL4 Geil
Video Card(s)	MSI 8800 GTX 768 MB @621 GPU 945 Memory
Storage	3*500 raid + 500 harici + 160 GBYT
Display(s)	17. lcd philips
Case	feel hurricane 1
Audio Device(s)	onboard
Power Supply	750 Watt Silver Stone
Software	win xp sp3

System Name	money pit..
Processor	Intel 9900K 4.8 at 1.152 core voltage minus 0.120 offset
Motherboard	Asus rog Strix Z370-F Gaming
Cooling	Dark Rock TF air cooler.. Stock vga air coolers with case side fans to help cooling..
Memory	32 gb corsair vengeance 3200
Video Card(s)	Palit Gaming Pro OC 2080TI
Storage	150 nvme boot drive partition.. 1T Sandisk sata.. 1T Transend sata.. 1T 970 evo nvme m 2..
Display(s)	27" Asus PG279Q ROG Swift 165Hrz Nvidia G-Sync, IPS.. 2560x1440..
Case	Gigabyte mid-tower.. cheap and nothing special..
Audio Device(s)	onboard sounds with stereo amp..
Power Supply	EVGA 850 watt..
Mouse	Logitech G700s
Keyboard	Logitech K270
Software	Win 10 pro..
Benchmark Scores	Firestike 29500.. timepsy 14000..

Processor	Q6600 2.4 GHZ@ 3.754 GHZ
Motherboard	Asus P5Q
Cooling	stok fan
Memory	4 GBYT DDR2 CL4 Geil
Video Card(s)	MSI 8800 GTX 768 MB @621 GPU 945 Memory
Storage	3*500 raid + 500 harici + 160 GBYT
Display(s)	17. lcd philips
Case	feel hurricane 1
Audio Device(s)	onboard
Power Supply	750 Watt Silver Stone
Software	win xp sp3

System Name	Money Pit
Processor	Core2Duo E6600 @ 3.2
Motherboard	Asus P5E
Cooling	Zerotherm Nivana NV 120
Memory	4 gigs Corsair Dominator PC8500
Video Card(s)	GeCube 3870--860/1350 & MSI 3870--860/1350 in CF
Storage	1- 250gig Western Dig.Caviar RE Sata and 1-160 gig Western Digital IDE
Display(s)	Mag inovision 19"
Case	NZXT Tempest ( IT ROCKS :D )
Audio Device(s)	Creative X-Fi xtreme music
Power Supply	Ultra X Pro 750 watt
Software	Vista Home Premium with SP 1

System Name	MY PC
Processor	E8400 @ 3.80Ghz > Q9650 3.60Ghz
Motherboard	Maximus Formula
Cooling	D5, 7/16" ID Tubing, Maze4 with Fuzion CPU WB
Memory	XMS 8500C5D @ 1066MHz
Video Card(s)	HD 2900 XT 858/900 to 4870 to 5870 (Keep Vreg area clean)
Storage	2
Display(s)	24"
Case	P180
Audio Device(s)	X-fi Plantinum
Power Supply	Silencer 750
Software	XP Pro SP3 to Windows 7
Benchmark Scores	This varies from one driver to another.

System Name	Ummmm...Mine
Processor	I7 920 @ 4.2ghz @ 1.29v's load
Motherboard	ASUS P6T Deluxe V2
Cooling	Custom 1/2 inch H20
Memory	3x2gb Patriot Sector 7 @2008Mhz 27-9-11-9 1T
Video Card(s)	EVGA GTX 580 SC 900/1800/1090
Storage	1-Mushkin 60gb SSD 1-500GB WD Black and 2-1TB 32mb WD Black
Display(s)	25 inch Hanns-G 2ms
Case	Custom
Audio Device(s)	Turtle Beach Catalina
Power Supply	Corsair AX850 Pro Series-Modular
Software	All Kinds...and then some.
Benchmark Scores	3dMark 11 P7066 Compare Link- http://3dmark.com/3dm11/251153

System Name	Daedalus \| O'Neill \| ZPM Hive \|
Processor	M3 Pro (11/14) \| Epyc 7402p \| i5 12400F \|
Motherboard	Apple M3 Pro \| SM H11SSL-i \| TUF B660M-E D4 \|
Cooling	Pure Silence \| Noctua NH-U12S TR4 \| Noctua NH-D14 \|
Memory	18GB Unified \| 128GB DDR4 \| 16GB DDR4 \|
Video Card(s)	M3 Pro \| RTX 4070FE (VM) \| ARC A750 LE \|
Storage	512GB NVME \| ALOT of SSD's \| 1TB NVME \|
Display(s)	14" 3024x1964 \| IPMI \| 1440p UW \|
Case	Macbook Pro 14" \| NZXT H510 Flow\| BC1 Test Bench \|
Audio Device(s)	Onboard \| None \| Onboard \|
Power Supply	~ 77w Magsafe \| EVGA 750w G3 \| HX1000i \|
Mouse	Razer Basilisk
Keyboard	Logitech G915 TKL
Software	MacOS Sonoma \| Proxmox 8 \| Win 11 x64 \|

Crysis benchmark tool

New Member

New Member

New Member

New Member

New Member

Attachments

New Member

New Member

New Member

New Member

New Member

New Member

Attachments

New Member

New Member

New Member

New Member

New Member

New Member

New Member

New Member

New Member

New Member

New Member

New Member