techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > www.techpowerup.com > Reviews

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-28-2008, 02:42 PM     #51
wtf8269
1000 Posts
 
wtf8269's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,780 (1.06/day)
Thanks: 33
Thanked 22 Times in 21 Posts
Send a message via AIM to wtf8269

System Specs

It's quite obvious that this card shines in higher resolutions-which is what I need. I need to run 1600x1200 for my LCD. I just purchased two of these; can't wait to get the rest of the system together. It may not be the most efficient card or the quietest, but I'm not particularly concerned about that. It's not as high of a performance card as I would have liked, but I think two of these should do a great job of lasting me most of the way through college.
__________________

My next PC needs a different motherboard.
My Xfire. Feel free to add me.
wtf8269 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2008, 02:43 PM     #52
tigger
I'm the only one
 
tigger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Yorkshire,hull,uk
Posts: 6,043 (4.50/day)
Thanks: 207
Thanked 582 Times in 511 Posts
Send a message via MSN to tigger

System Specs

Wow nice,i cant wait to see some benchies with two of 'em.
tigger is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2008, 02:46 PM     #53
Jelle Mees
500 Posts
 
Jelle Mees's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Belgium ⇒ Limburg
Posts: 633 (0.95/day)
Thanks: 29
Thanked 121 Times in 90 Posts
Send a message via MSN to Jelle Mees

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by rampage View Post
yes i agree, crysis is very GPU limited and hence the need for a good card, im what i think most people are trying to get at is cpu speed has to have some effect in general gaming, or why do we all even bother overclocking our pc's if it dosnt help???
It does, but CPU overclock doesn't do you much good in CryEngine 2. An overclock WILL provide you way better performance in UnrealEngine 3 games, Source Engine games, in fact, most games will get a huge performance boost, Crysis just isn't one of them.
__________________
My Blog => http://www.JelleMees.info
Jelle Mees is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2008, 02:57 PM     #54
trog100
2500 Posts
 
trog100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,401 (3.07/day)
Thanks: 5
Thanked 260 Times in 233 Posts

System Specs

crysis played the same on my amd system as it does on my current 4 gig wolfdlale system..

a faster cpu will only benefit if artificially low resolutions are used.. or with older games that already run more than enough frame rates.. supreme commander being a special case.. all those units aint driven by the grafix card..

trog
trog100 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2008, 02:59 PM     #55
Tatty_One
Retired Overclocker
 
Tatty_One's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Worcestershire UK
Posts: 8,876 (6.32/day)
Thanks: 538
Thanked 921 Times in 781 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Tatty_One

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by HookeyStreet View Post
Awesome review, but I think the tests would have been more accurate if a better CPU was used (IMHO, all of these current cards need a C2D/C2Q of at least 3.2Gz speed to push them along)
I agree totally but W1z does his reviews from the "average consumer" angle and what the average guy (and therefore does not overclock) can expect to get from a system containing in this case a HD3870 x2.

You could argue thats in relative terms, the G92 8800GTS overclocks a bit more than the HD3870 (650mhz - 825mhz) and therefore would beat it in a few more than the exisiting 5 or 6 benches it already beats it in.
__________________
Tatty_One is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2008, 03:00 PM     #56
Urbklr
1000 Posts
 
Urbklr's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Truro, NS Canada
Posts: 1,810 (1.96/day)
Thanks: 127
Thanked 239 Times in 208 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Urbklr Send a message via MSN to Urbklr

System Specs

Crysis GPU limited??.....I find this interesting, let me clock my e6550 stock, run the timedemo and then come back, im pretty sure the performance will be held back quite a bit. I ran my cpu at 3.4 then 3.44, and there was a FPS improvement....
Urbklr is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2008, 03:04 PM     #57
Tatty_One
Retired Overclocker
 
Tatty_One's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Worcestershire UK
Posts: 8,876 (6.32/day)
Thanks: 538
Thanked 921 Times in 781 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Tatty_One

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by wtf8269 View Post
It's quite obvious that this card shines in higher resolutions-which is what I need. I need to run 1600x1200 for my LCD. I just purchased two of these; can't wait to get the rest of the system together. It may not be the most efficient card or the quietest, but I'm not particularly concerned about that. It's not as high of a performance card as I would have liked, but I think two of these should do a great job of lasting me most of the way through college.
Lets just hope you get a QX9650 running at 4.5gig+ to realise the full potential!!
__________________
Tatty_One is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2008, 03:09 PM     #58
trog100
2500 Posts
 
trog100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,401 (3.07/day)
Thanks: 5
Thanked 260 Times in 233 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tatty_One View Post
Lets just hope you get a QX9650 running at 4.5gig+ to realise the full potential!!
do i detect some "humour" there tatty..

trog
trog100 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2008, 03:12 PM     #59
Urbklr
1000 Posts
 
Urbklr's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Truro, NS Canada
Posts: 1,810 (1.96/day)
Thanks: 127
Thanked 239 Times in 208 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Urbklr Send a message via MSN to Urbklr

System Specs

Crysis- CPU 3.44GHz Card stock- 32FPS Average, Min 18, Max 38
Card 830/900- 34FPS Average, Min 23, Max 41
3.4GHz Card 830/900- 29FPS Average, Min 20, Max 34

That looks like a pretty decent boost, 34FPS vs 29FPS....
Urbklr is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2008, 03:15 PM     #60
Tatty_One
Retired Overclocker
 
Tatty_One's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Worcestershire UK
Posts: 8,876 (6.32/day)
Thanks: 538
Thanked 921 Times in 781 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Tatty_One

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by trog100 View Post
do i detect some "humour" there tatty..

trog

I am FULL of it......humour that is Have you not heard the old saying?......

"two HD3870 x2 on a slow CPU equall one HD3870 x2 on a fast CPU" ......yeah OK I just made it up but it sounds good to me!
__________________
Tatty_One is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2008, 03:20 PM     #61
AsRock
TPU addict
 
AsRock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 4,073 (4.61/day)
Thanks: 430
Thanked 487 Times in 436 Posts

System Specs

Would be nice to see how it does with Armed Assault \Combat Operations.
__________________
Defrag your computer right, UltimateDefrag Freeware Edition 1.72
http://forums.techpowerup.com/showth...837#post927837
AsRock is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2008, 03:21 PM     #62
Jelle Mees
500 Posts
 
Jelle Mees's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Belgium ⇒ Limburg
Posts: 633 (0.95/day)
Thanks: 29
Thanked 121 Times in 90 Posts
Send a message via MSN to Jelle Mees

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Urbklr911 View Post
Crysis GPU limited??.....I find this interesting, let me clock my e6550 stock, run the timedemo and then come back, im pretty sure the performance will be held back quite a bit. I ran my cpu at 3.4 then 3.44, and there was a FPS improvement....
Maybe this might convince you:
http://www.techarp.com/showarticle.a...tno=499&pgno=3

As you can see, if you play Crysis on 1600x1200, there is only 6% difference between the E6320 and the QX6700 while in reality the QX6700 is more then 50% faster then the E6320!
__________________
My Blog => http://www.JelleMees.info
Jelle Mees is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2008, 03:23 PM     #63
gR3iF
1000 Posts
 
gR3iF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Hamburg
Posts: 1,689 (0.99/day)
Thanks: 9
Thanked 34 Times in 32 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to gR3iF Send a message via MSN to gR3iF

System Specs

Some good new Drivers would be good.



W1zz:
What about comparism between a 3870x2 and a crossfire 3870. Then we can see what amd really did.
gR3iF is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2008, 03:36 PM     #64
trog100
2500 Posts
 
trog100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,401 (3.07/day)
Thanks: 5
Thanked 260 Times in 233 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Urbklr911 View Post
Crysis- CPU 3.44GHz Card stock- 32FPS Average, Min 18, Max 38
Card 830/900- 34FPS Average, Min 23, Max 41
3.4GHz Card 830/900- 29FPS Average, Min 20, Max 34

That looks like a pretty decent boost, 34FPS vs 29FPS....
u have to be running a very low resolution and settings for that to happen.. it dosnt happen with higher ones.. the lower the resolution and setting the higher the gain..

at the resolutions and settings i played the game at its pretty much pure grafix card limited..

it all comes down to the resolution and settings.. but what u see isnt the same as what i see thats for sure.. at 1680 x 1050 high settings i see next to no gain from with messing with high or low cpu speeds..

trog
trog100 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2008, 03:38 PM     #65
W1zzard
Administrator
 
W1zzard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
Posts: 7,626 (3.78/day)
Thanks: 79
Thanked 2,492 Times in 935 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to W1zzard Send a message via AIM to W1zzard Send a message via MSN to W1zzard

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by gR3iF View Post
What about comparism between a 3870x2 and a crossfire 3870. Then we can see what amd really did.
I dont have two 3870 cards
W1zzard is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2008, 03:41 PM     #66
Urbklr
1000 Posts
 
Urbklr's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Truro, NS Canada
Posts: 1,810 (1.96/day)
Thanks: 127
Thanked 239 Times in 208 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Urbklr Send a message via MSN to Urbklr

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by trog100 View Post
u have to be running a very low resolution and settings for that to happen.. it dosnt happen with higher ones.. the lower the resolution and setting the higher the gain..

at the resolutions and settings i played the game at its pretty much pure grafix card limited..

it all comes down to the resolution and settings..

trog
I was running at 1280x1024 all high, with DX10 water....and sunshafts, and it happened....But i guess that isnt that high of a resolution. But for the 5FPS increase from the very slight clock difference, that's pretty good...
Urbklr is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2008, 03:43 PM     #67
trog100
2500 Posts
 
trog100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,401 (3.07/day)
Thanks: 5
Thanked 260 Times in 233 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by gR3iF View Post
Some good new Drivers would be good.



W1zz:
What about comparism between a 3870x2 and a crossfire 3870. Then we can see what amd really did.
not a lot from reading other places.. its crossfire on one card..

trog
trog100 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2008, 03:48 PM     #68
TUngsten
500 Posts
 
TUngsten's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: CT, USA
Posts: 876 (0.80/day)
Thanks: 14
Thanked 55 Times in 48 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by W1zzard View Post
I dont have two 3870 cards
that's just plain wrong!!!
__________________
Objects, Artifacts, Arcane Mechanica www.terrencelavin.com
TUngsten is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2008, 03:49 PM     #69
trog100
2500 Posts
 
trog100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,401 (3.07/day)
Thanks: 5
Thanked 260 Times in 233 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Urbklr911 View Post
I was running at 1280x1024 all high, with DX10 water....and sunshafts, and it happened....But i guess that isnt that high of a resolution. But for the 5FPS increase from the very slight clock difference, that's pretty good...
yes it does seem to be a gain.. but u wont see the same in the gpu bench.. how the cpu bench gain pans out in the game i dont know but i dont think it would be noticable..

overall its grafix card limited.. faster grafix card.. big gain.. faster cpu very small not really noticeable gain..

trog
trog100 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2008, 03:54 PM     #70
Jelle Mees
500 Posts
 
Jelle Mees's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Belgium ⇒ Limburg
Posts: 633 (0.95/day)
Thanks: 29
Thanked 121 Times in 90 Posts
Send a message via MSN to Jelle Mees

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by trog100 View Post
overall its grafix card limited.. faster grafix card.. big gain.. faster cpu very small not really noticeable gain..
Yep
__________________
My Blog => http://www.JelleMees.info
Jelle Mees is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2008, 04:18 PM     #71
pt
not a suicide-bomber
 
pt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Portugal
Posts: 5,869 (4.34/day)
Thanks: 106
Thanked 219 Times in 192 Posts
Send a message via MSN to pt

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by W1zzard View Post
added the "performance summary" page to the review .. ouch ..
ouch?
pt is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2008, 05:33 PM     #72
BullGod
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Medias City
Posts: 261 (0.35/day)
Thanks: 8
Thanked 31 Times in 29 Posts

Well imo this card is a total disappointment. That's why it got an 8. Are you people blind? The performance is crap. It was faster than the other cards only in old games that run at 100 fps plus. Where is the gain in that? You don't need more than 100 fps. You do need more than 30 tho. In most games that go under 100fps it was not the fastest card. So what are you really getting here?
BullGod is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2008, 05:41 PM     #73
BullGod
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Medias City
Posts: 261 (0.35/day)
Thanks: 8
Thanked 31 Times in 29 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by pt View Post
ouch?
yeah ouch. It only outperforms the GTX by 5%. Were talking about a card here that is more than a year old and this one uses two GPU's just manages to be faster by such a small margin. And yeah the ultra usually outperforms the GTX by 10 to 15% so I guess that's why he didn't include it in the review...
BullGod is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2008, 05:50 PM     #74
rampage
500 Posts
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Victoria, Australia
Posts: 726 (0.80/day)
Thanks: 82
Thanked 60 Times in 56 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by BullGod View Post
Well imo this card is a total disappointment. That's why it got an 8. Are you people blind? The performance is crap. It was faster than the other cards only in old games that run at 100 fps plus. Where is the gain in that? You don't need more than 100 fps. You do need more than 30 tho. In most games that go under 100fps it was not the fastest card. So what are you really getting here?
i think this more to the point, we all know we cant expect a 100% performance increase or even a 50% increase but what we recieved was a 5% in "relative Performance", with a 19>36% performance hit in the "perfromance per watt" comparision and with prices simlar or slightly more expecive to is compition (prices taken from Australian market)

(these results are taken from W1zzards from resualts as you may have gathered)

p.s. come to think of it i dont think we will see w1zzard comming out saying well here you go, but btw its crap...... (if this is what he thinks, its only me guessing here)....
__________________
Grandma / Torrent - Asus p5e-vm HDMI, e6750, 2 gig 5-5-5-15, samsung 200 gig, generic micro case, 19" LCD
HTPC - AMD 4850e, Gigabyte GA-MA78GM-S2H (780G), 2 gig 5-5-5-15, 500GB hdd, micro case, LG 42" 1080P LCD TV, Logitec Z-5500 5.1 speaker set
rampage is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2008, 06:31 PM     #75
DaMulta
My stars went supernova
 
DaMulta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Oklahoma T-Town
Posts: 9,741 (8.07/day)
Thanks: 980
Thanked 1,261 Times in 978 Posts

System Specs

Look what popped up at XS

Quote:
Originally Posted by zbogorgon





http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...eply&p=2731988
__________________
ocLIT The Hardware Punishers
DaMulta is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to DaMulta For This Useful Post:
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Sim City 4 choppy on new Graphics cards acperience7 Games 26 08-13-2008 08:31 PM
New 2900XT (new drivers) vs 8800 GTS Review d44ve Graphics Cards 66 01-29-2008 12:33 AM
Random Restars - > Video Card - > PSU TrAiN^WrEcK General Hardware 37 05-08-2007 03:05 PM
having problems with cod 2 MATTB25 Games 12 07-19-2006 02:45 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:26 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts