techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > www.techpowerup.com > News

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Jul 11, 2008, 06:30 AM   #1
btarunr
News Editor
 
btarunr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 12,053 (11.75/day)
Thanks: 601
Thanked 4,510 Times in 2,506 Posts
Send a message via AIM to btarunr Send a message via MSN to btarunr

System Specs

Bloomfield + SLI: Possible

Industry sources indicate that NVIDIA has acquired a QPI license to manufacture desktop core-logic (chipset) for the upcoming Nehalem-based processors. NVIDIA looks at a quick-fix solution to offer SLI support for the upcoming LGA-1366 motherboards. It's too late for them to prepare a full-fledged chipset since X58 is dressing up to go to office and that's slated for as early as Q4, 2008. The quick-fix solution is that NVIDIA offers a certain chip that can be used on X58 motherboards that allows those boards to support NVIDIA SLI. This solution is in many respects similar to the Intel D5400XS "Skulltrail" board, where two NForce 200 (BR-04) chips were used alongside the Intel 5400A northbridge that allowed 2-way SLI. The NVIDIA BR-04 chip costs US $30 for motherboard manufacturers.

As for Lynnfield, NVIDIA will try to debut a full-fledged LGA-1160 motherboard since there is ample time to work on that. The quick-fix ensures that when LGA-1366 X58 does come out, and NVIDIA doesn't have a chipset ready, the advantage of multi-GPU doesn't go to ATI since X58 supports ATI Crossfire and is already touted to support 4-way ATI Crossfire X technology. LGA-1160 boards lack QuickPath interconnect as a chipset bus. Since NVIDIA lacks access to QuickPath technology, it can continue to use its competitive HyperTransport link which it's been using since the NForce 2 days.

Don't expect too many of these SLI LGA 1366 boards soon though. Reason being that each BR-04 chip costs $30, requires motherboard makers to re-design their motherboards (since most vendors seem to be ready with their X58 board designs), and a redesign would push back entry by a few months (for release of these SLI supportive boards).



Source: Expreview
btarunr is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 11, 2008, 08:16 AM   #2
btarunr
News Editor
 
btarunr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 12,053 (11.75/day)
Thanks: 601
Thanked 4,510 Times in 2,506 Posts
Send a message via AIM to btarunr Send a message via MSN to btarunr

System Specs

In other words:



I lopped off a part.
__________________

జై తెలంగాణా
btarunr is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 11, 2008, 09:04 AM   #3
Wile E
Power User
 
Wile E's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Western PA (Pittsburgh suburbs)
Posts: 15,840 (11.32/day)
Thanks: 341
Thanked 3,004 Times in 2,555 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Wile E Send a message via Yahoo to Wile E

System Specs

Sweeeeeeet!!!!! SLI and XFire on a standard desktop board. This is what I'm holding out for.
__________________

Visit Ashentech
“What the hell did you expect? Leave Vista under the pillow and the OS fairy would make it Win7?” -El Fiendo
“And Bring Mailman back god damnit, he is the Eric Cartman of TPU” -MRCL
Wile E is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 11, 2008, 09:59 AM   #4
ShinyG
75 Posts
 
ShinyG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Romania
Posts: 184 (0.10/day)
Thanks: 6
Thanked 13 Times in 13 Posts

System Specs

"each BR-04 chip costs $30"
Translation in retail: the SLI enabled motherboards will cost 50 to 100$ more depending on manufacturers!
Also, I hate the two socket strategy Intel is going to use: it means less flexibility for chipmakers like nVidia, increased costs for board manufacturers, less upgrade paths for endusers and so on. And guess who has to put up with these "small consequences"?! Us, the users
Dark times are coming to the CPU market!
__________________
The one and only!
ShinyG is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 11, 2008, 10:45 AM   #5
Master_of_Time
25 Posts
 
Master_of_Time's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Sofia, Bulgaria
Posts: 57 (0.07/day)
Thanks: 23
Thanked 13 Times in 11 Posts

System Specs

Wait, who said that the mobos with the nVidia chips will be dual-socket? I didn't read that anywhere... Look carefully at the first post - it says "...in many respects similar to the Intel D5400XS "Skulltrail" board, where two NForce 200 (BR-04) chips were used alongside the Intel 5400A..." Cheers!
__________________

Z-5500 Club
Master_of_Time is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 11, 2008, 10:48 AM   #6
btarunr
News Editor
 
btarunr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 12,053 (11.75/day)
Thanks: 601
Thanked 4,510 Times in 2,506 Posts
Send a message via AIM to btarunr Send a message via MSN to btarunr

System Specs

Nobody said dual-socket either.
__________________

జై తెలంగాణా
btarunr is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 11, 2008, 11:21 AM   #7
qwerty_lesh
200 Posts
 
qwerty_lesh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 365 (0.33/day)
Thanks: 15
Thanked 12 Times in 11 Posts
Send a message via Yahoo to qwerty_lesh

System Specs

its still about time, if they could convert the intel nb over two chips through a ht bus for skulltrail, then why not? im glad that this is emerging, intel chipsets are far more available in the market, with the ability to sli, the future looks even more noob friendly

edit: well as long as it 'paves' the way huh
__________________
Gaming: GIGABYTE X58-UD5, Rev 1.0, F8e - i7 920 - Noctua NH-U12P - 3x2GB OCZ Platinum PC3-10666 C7 - Sapphire HD5870 - Antec P182 - TruePower Trio 650w - 24" Acer x243H, 22" Asus MW22U - 4x 500GB ST3500320AS 7200.11, SD1A - Windows 7 Ultimate x64

HTPC1: GIGABYTE P35-DS4 - E6750 - 4GB OCZ SystemElite 800 - GIGABYTE 8800GTX - TT Shark - Earthwatts 500w - Windows 7 Ultimate x64
HTPC2: GIGABYTE 945GCMX-S2 - E4300 - 2GB Corsair DHX 800 C5 - GIGABYTE 7600GT - Antec Fusion - Windows 7 Ultimate x64
qwerty_lesh is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 11, 2008, 12:49 PM   #8
JrRacinFan
Served 5k and counting ...
 
JrRacinFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Youngstown, OH
Posts: 10,395 (8.44/day)
Thanks: 2,115
Thanked 2,355 Times in 2,201 Posts
Send a message via AIM to JrRacinFan Send a message via Yahoo to JrRacinFan

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Master_of_Time View Post
Wait, who said that the mobos with the nVidia chips will be dual-socket? I didn't read that anywhere... Look carefully at the first post - it says "...in many respects similar to the Intel D5400XS "Skulltrail" board, where two NForce 200 (BR-04) chips were used alongside the Intel 5400A..." Cheers!
I understood his comment about LGA1066 vs. LGA1366(I think??). But yes Wile E, very interesting indeed, but could be taken the opposite way as well, why add the chips to the end users board that does not want them?
JrRacinFan is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 11, 2008, 01:14 PM   #9
btarunr
News Editor
 
btarunr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 12,053 (11.75/day)
Thanks: 601
Thanked 4,510 Times in 2,506 Posts
Send a message via AIM to btarunr Send a message via MSN to btarunr

System Specs

That schematic just shows how X58 and Ibex Peak deal differently, and of how X58 + SLI works.
__________________

జై తెలంగాణా
btarunr is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 11, 2008, 01:26 PM   #10
wolf2009
2000 Posts
 
wolf2009's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: MI
Posts: 2,857 (3.16/day)
Thanks: 251
Thanked 557 Times in 301 Posts

System Specs

things looking good .

i'm sure recent price/performance of 2xATI cards on widely available intel mobos , forced Nvidia to give its SLI technology to Intel .
__________________

Read My Avatar's Story
wolf2009 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 11, 2008, 01:40 PM   #11
newtekie1
Semi-Retired Folder
 
newtekie1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 11,278 (6.59/day)
Thanks: 426
Thanked 2,174 Times in 1,719 Posts

System Specs

Very nice, Intel Chipset boards with SLI. This is what I've wanted for a long time. I still wish nVidia would just allow it without the stupid extra chip though, but I guess their chipset devision has to make some money some how, even if it is charging $30 for a chip that does absolutely nothing.
__________________
“Nvidia fanboy at the best?” -Imsochobo
“...get off the ATI fanboat.” -$immond$
“You multi faceted fanboy, you.” -El Fiendo
“It's just me, your local ATi and nVidia fanboy.” -newtekie1
newtekie1 is online now  
10 Million points folded for TPU
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 11, 2008, 03:09 PM   #12
yogurt_21
2000 Posts
 
yogurt_21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,248 (1.38/day)
Thanks: 233
Thanked 146 Times in 133 Posts

System Specs

sweet finally the ability to buy one board and still have the option to run the fastest graphics cmbination from either party. that's somethign we haven't seen since the agp days lol.
yogurt_21 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 11, 2008, 03:27 PM   #13
DaMulta
My stars went supernova
 
DaMulta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Oklahoma T-Town
Posts: 9,827 (6.74/day)
Thanks: 1,007
Thanked 1,306 Times in 1,001 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by yogurt_21 View Post
sweet finally the ability to buy one board and still have the option to run the fastest graphics cmbination from either party. that's somethign we haven't seen since the agp days lol.
But you could only run one card on AGP, so what's the same as the old days?
__________________
ocLIT The Hardware Punishers
DaMulta is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU Folding for Team TPU
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 11, 2008, 09:30 PM   #14
sethk
25 Posts
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 53 (0.04/day)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts

It would make the most sense to have Nvidia commission the design of a reference board from Foxconn or one of the other big manufacturers like they do with the current Nvidia reference 750i, 780i and 790i boards, and have EVGA, XFX, BFGTech etc brand those boards with a couple of tweaked designs like the FTW series from EVGA. Asus, MSI etc. would probably design their own boards soon after.

Also for those who think the Nvidia chips do nothing - in addition to the SLI bridge, the Nforce chipset does have a proprietary function that allows the SLI cards to talk to each other via their PCIe interface point to point through the chipset without going through the CPU or rest of the PCIe bus, unlike normal PCIe cards. In reality, I would be surprised if this made more than a 2% difference in performance under some circumstances. The user-made diagram above does not reflect this. There were some official Skulltrail diagrams that showed this better.

Last edited by sethk; Jul 13, 2008 at 04:55 PM.
sethk is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
NVIDIA Announces Hybrid SLI Jimmy 2004 News 13 Jan 9, 2008 07:06 AM
NVIDIA Replaces nForce 570 SLI and 590 SLI Intel Edition malware News 0 Oct 4, 2006 05:24 AM
NVIDIA SLI Technology and Intel Core 2 Processors Selected by Global PC Builders malware News 8 Jul 28, 2006 06:04 PM
Nvidia bridgeless SLI and SLI AA appear Dark Ride News 0 Jul 19, 2005 11:52 PM
ECS KN1 SLI Extreme W1zzard Reviews 0 Jul 12, 2005 11:21 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:39 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts