- Joined
- Nov 13, 2007
- Messages
- 10,233 (1.70/day)
- Location
- Austin Texas
Processor | 13700KF Undervolted @ 5.6/ 5.5, 4.8Ghz Ring 200W PL1 |
---|---|
Motherboard | MSI 690-I PRO |
Cooling | Thermalright Peerless Assassin 120 w/ Arctic P12 Fans |
Memory | 48 GB DDR5 7600 MHZ CL36 |
Video Card(s) | RTX 4090 FE |
Storage | 2x 2TB WDC SN850, 1TB Samsung 960 prr |
Display(s) | Alienware 32" 4k 240hz OLED |
Case | SLIGER S620 |
Audio Device(s) | Yes |
Power Supply | Corsair SF750 |
Mouse | Xlite V2 |
Keyboard | RoyalAxe |
Software | Windows 11 |
Benchmark Scores | They're pretty good, nothing crazy. |
Fits....... very nice, now get some volts runnin thru them CPU's!
@ mastrdvr.... yes anything 1156/1366 will in most things get more performance from turbo enabled as the linky above clearly shows.
Ok so im confused... lets say I'm stable on an 1156 at 4Ghz with 1.28v... (not even sure that TB works after 4ghz but lets say it does) with TB off.
If i enable Turbo Boost, I would have to up the voltage to 1.33v to prevent BSOD - because the CPU ramps up to 4.2ghz on a 21x multi - clearly i would get more performance over the 4ghz setup, at the cost of higher temps and volts, but would I get higher performance than if i was just to run a straight 4.2Ghz overclock? No right?
Sorry for the stupid question, but Im not understanding if enabling Turbo Boost actually speeds up the clock per clock operation of the chip by 5% or if its a performance increase based on clockspeed increases.