techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > www.techpowerup.com > Reviews

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 02-27-2009, 08:17 PM     #1
W1zzard
Administrator
 
W1zzard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
Posts: 7,617 (3.77/day)
Thanks: 79
Thanked 2,489 Times in 932 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to W1zzard Send a message via AIM to W1zzard Send a message via MSN to W1zzard

System Specs

Inno3D iChill GTX 260

To read this review go to: http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I...Chill_GTX_260/

Please Digg the review to help us promote it.

Last edited by W1zzard; 03-02-2009 at 12:13 PM.
W1zzard is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to W1zzard For This Useful Post:
Old 03-02-2009, 10:53 AM     #2
OnBoard
1000 Posts
 
OnBoard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Finland
Posts: 2,197 (1.89/day)
Thanks: 189
Thanked 238 Times in 189 Posts

System Specs

Fan noise page:
Quote:
Originally Posted by W1zzard View Post
When it comes to fan noise, this is where the Inno3D iChill GTX 260 can shine. It is easily the quietest high performance offering on the NVIDIA market right now. Actually I would go as far as claim this is the quietest high performance graphics card on the market today. The cooler does such a great job that the fan speed does not have to increase between idle and noise which alone is an awesome feat. Together with the low temperatures this would allow for some additional fan tweaking resulting in even less noise. Truly outstanding!
idle and load

Accelero looking great there, reason why I wanted to read the review. But how were the VRM temps, with FurMark especially?

Looking forward to getting Accelero Xtreme GTX 280 as soon as they are released, agree you on that the VRM cooler would have needed couple screws or pushpins like on previous after market coolers for G200.

Retail one comes with 2 memory sinks on front and a backplate on rear to cool rest of the chips, but seems the overall low temps on the card keeps the memory also cool, seeing how high it still clokced.
OnBoard is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2009, 10:57 AM     #3
W1zzard
Administrator
 
W1zzard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
Posts: 7,617 (3.77/day)
Thanks: 79
Thanked 2,489 Times in 932 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to W1zzard Send a message via AIM to W1zzard Send a message via MSN to W1zzard

System Specs

typo fixed, i am not sure if the retail ones come with the memory sinks. yes, the press pictures show it, but i havent seen anyone else with physical product to confirm
W1zzard is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2009, 11:03 AM     #4
OnBoard
1000 Posts
 
OnBoard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Finland
Posts: 2,197 (1.89/day)
Thanks: 189
Thanked 238 Times in 189 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by W1zzard View Post
typo fixed, i am not sure if the retail ones come with the memory sinks. yes, the press pictures show it, but i havent seen anyone else with physical product to confirm
They are in the installation manual too:
http://www.arctic-cooling.com/catalo...eme_GTX280.pdf

Quote:
Originally Posted by W1zzard
The only problem that I can foresee is that the high price will turn away a lot of potential buyers. A normal GTX 260 216 SP reference card will cost about $220 online, which is $80 less than what Inno3D is asking for their card. If the product would be positioned closer to $250, which is about the price increase when buying a retail Arctic Cooling Accelero XXX cooler, it would certainly sell in much larger volumes.
And the cooler is quite expensive, that's why this card is also so much more. edit: still cheaper though to buy normal GTX 260 (65nm or need to get creative with VRM cooling) + Accelero GTX 280
MSRP (excl. VAT):
49,95 € / US$ 61.95
OnBoard is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2009, 11:10 AM     #5
W1zzard
Administrator
 
W1zzard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
Posts: 7,617 (3.77/day)
Thanks: 79
Thanked 2,489 Times in 932 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to W1zzard Send a message via AIM to W1zzard Send a message via MSN to W1zzard

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by OnBoard View Post
They are in the installation manual too:
http://www.arctic-cooling.com/catalo...eme_GTX280.pdf
that doesnt necessarily mean that inno3d includes them. i'm sure ac would sell the cooler to you without the memory cooling for a reduced price
W1zzard is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2009, 11:15 AM     #6
OnBoard
1000 Posts
 
OnBoard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Finland
Posts: 2,197 (1.89/day)
Thanks: 189
Thanked 238 Times in 189 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by W1zzard View Post
that doesnt necessarily mean that inno3d includes them. i'm sure ac would sell the cooler to you without the memory cooling for a reduced price
Yes, meant just that the retail cooler should have them, Inno3D saved a bit and didn't (order) include them.
Does the card PCB bend with the cooler on it? Original GTX260/280 backplate should work with this cooler to counter that. Accelero backplate probably too, although it's connected with just thermatape.

edit: oh and sorry for the question hour, this is just first review of that cooler too

Last edited by OnBoard; 03-02-2009 at 11:21 AM.
OnBoard is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2009, 11:30 AM     #7
lemonadesoda
2500 Posts
 
lemonadesoda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,892 (4.14/day)
Thanks: 622
Thanked 760 Times in 591 Posts

System Specs

Wiz, could you please publish a "dead idle" power statistic for your i7 rig? Pull any GPU card out and boot the PC (even if there is no internal graphics, just do this with a blank screen). See the draw after 5 minutes (plenty of boot up time and idle).

The difference between THAT figure and the figures shown in the review is the true power draw for the card.

Performance per watt statistic should be based on this figure.

statistic = performance / (draw - draw at dead idle)

I think that may fundamentally change your charts. (And is much closer to the truth).
lemonadesoda is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2009, 11:37 AM     #8
W1zzard
Administrator
 
W1zzard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
Posts: 7,617 (3.77/day)
Thanks: 79
Thanked 2,489 Times in 932 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to W1zzard Send a message via AIM to W1zzard Send a message via MSN to W1zzard

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by lemonadesoda View Post
Wiz, could you please publish a "dead idle" power statistic for your i7 rig? Pull any GPU card out and boot the PC (even if there is no internal graphics, just do this with a blank screen). See the draw after 5 minutes (plenty of boot up time and idle).

The difference between THAT figure and the figures shown in the review is the true power draw for the card.

Performance per watt statistic should be based on this figure.

statistic = performance / (draw - draw at dead idle)

I think that may fundamentally change your charts. (And is much closer to the truth).
not true, while it may work for idle, it will not work for under load.

if you look at the idle power draw chart you see that the system with 4670 consumes 179W in idle. according to the numbers at a ht4u review where they measured just the card's power draw a 4670 consumes 8.3W in idle. under load we see 203W where ht4u sees 64.2W power draw for that card. our perf/watt scores include a 150W system power draw offset for this. sufficiently accurate in my opinion to reflect power draw
W1zzard is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2009, 12:04 PM     #9
OnBoard
1000 Posts
 
OnBoard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Finland
Posts: 2,197 (1.89/day)
Thanks: 189
Thanked 238 Times in 189 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by W1zzard View Post

Temperatures



Achieving such low GPU temperatures with a GTX 260 is truly amazing. Blow than 50°C under load, wow! This also means that you could relax the fan control settings even more to achieve a quieter work PC experience.
Spotted another
OnBoard is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2009, 12:14 PM     #10
W1zzard
Administrator
 
W1zzard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
Posts: 7,617 (3.77/day)
Thanks: 79
Thanked 2,489 Times in 932 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to W1zzard Send a message via AIM to W1zzard Send a message via MSN to W1zzard

System Specs

thanks .. leaving for cebit in 1 hour .. looks like being in a hurry comes back to me now
W1zzard is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2009, 12:25 PM     #11
OnBoard
1000 Posts
 
OnBoard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Finland
Posts: 2,197 (1.89/day)
Thanks: 189
Thanked 238 Times in 189 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by W1zzard View Post
thanks .. leaving for cebit in 1 hour .. looks like being in a hurry comes back to me now
Heh, have a fun trip! (and bring back goodies..pictures..babes)
OnBoard is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2009, 02:28 PM     #12
newtekie1
Semi-Retired Folder
 
newtekie1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 8,740 (5.98/day)
Thanks: 320
Thanked 1,429 Times in 1,172 Posts

System Specs

Why does the CPU-z screenshot show 55nm? Shouldn't it be 65nm for GT200 and 55nm for GT200b?
__________________

Rig1: System Specs.
Rig2: Xeon X3220@3.0GHz / P5N-E SLI / 2GB G.Skill DDR2-800 4-4-4-12 / eVGA GTX260 / Samsung DVD-Burner / 300GB WD + 2x1.5TB Seagate LP in RAID0
Rig3: Athlon X2 4200+ / M4A79 Deluxe / 4GB G.Skill Pi DDR2-800 4-4-4-12 / XFX HD4890 1GB / Sony DVD-Burner / 250GB Seagate
Rig4: C2DE2180@3.3GHz / Asus P5B / 2GB G.Skill DDR2-800 4-4-4-12 / eVGA 8800GTS 320MB / Samsung DVD-Burner / 80GB Seagate
newtekie1 is offline  
More than 25k PPD
Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2009, 03:44 PM     #13
iStink
250 Posts
 
iStink's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 492 (1.15/day)
Thanks: 37
Thanked 48 Times in 46 Posts

System Specs

Will a cooler like this fit a gtx285? When will something like this in the 285 flavor come out?
__________________
iStink is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2009, 03:51 PM     #14
OnBoard
1000 Posts
 
OnBoard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Finland
Posts: 2,197 (1.89/day)
Thanks: 189
Thanked 238 Times in 189 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by iStink View Post
Will a cooler like this fit a gtx285? When will something like this in the 285 flavor come out?
It does. Should come this month, but I've seen late april on one store I found it on.
OnBoard is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to OnBoard For This Useful Post:
Old 03-05-2009, 03:35 AM     #15
DaveK
500 Posts
 
DaveK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 892 (2.17/day)
Thanks: 51
Thanked 84 Times in 76 Posts
Send a message via MSN to DaveK

System Specs

I think that cooler looks fugly, but, it gets the job done I guess lol
DaveK is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2009, 04:21 AM     #16
Binge
2500 Posts
 
Binge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: PA, USA
Posts: 4,237 (9.78/day)
Thanks: 526
Thanked 1,007 Times in 854 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Binge Send a message via MSN to Binge

System Specs

This looks great. Owners will have even better temps with the addition of ram-sinks
__________________
*Peripheral- noun - computer peripheral, peripheral device ((computer science) electronic equipment connected by cable to the CPU of a computer) "disk drives and printers are important peripherals"

Read my latest peripheral review and please join/support the TPU Peripherals Club.
Binge is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2009, 04:21 AM     #17
Strouhal
5 Posts
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 7 (0.03/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

I am new to the PC building game, so please bear with me.

I do not have a system currently, so everything will be brand new. I'm building a desktop for gaming (mid-high end) from the ground up. The most difficult part of this is being able to maintain a forward looking view of all these products. Computer technology develops very fast, and you might buy a $300 video card today and have it be worthless as soon as DirectX 11 is released, for example. Thankfully SLI allows for a somewhat forward looking building process: Wait til more performance is necessary then stick in a second card (which has probably reduced in price). You don't lose that $300 dollars you spent on the first card because it is still being utilized, right?

Great review by the way. Your comparison to many other cards in almost every operating characteristic (including noise, which is very important to me) was extremely helpful in choosing a videocard.

So I am looking at the IChill GTX 260 and it has me thinking. It has all the characteristics of a card that I want, but I wonder if I'll be able to SLI with two of them (ASUS P6T Deluxe MoBo). The cooling looks to be very directional and very large, i.e. if you try to stick two of them together one of them is just going to be blowing hot air at the other one...actually I don't even know what direction those fans are flowing. Is it like some CPU coolers I've seen that blow air downward across the heat fins? That does make more sense...

To summarize my post and facilitate any question answering/advice:
-Great review, very helpful for someone starting from scratch w/o a lot of experience
-The iChillGTX260 would be a wonderful standalone card now, but perhaps not after a year of new developments
-Would I be able to SLI another one when the time comes, or would size (or air flow) constraints prevent that?

Thanks!
Strouhal is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Palit GTX 260 Sonic 216 SP W1zzard Reviews 4 02-27-2009 03:55 PM
Leadtek GeForce GTX 260 Extreme+ 216 Shaders W1zzard Reviews 15 12-26-2008 01:57 PM
Zotac GeForce GTX 260 Amp˛ Edition 216 Shaders W1zzard Reviews 59 09-28-2008 04:37 PM
Point of View GeForce GTX 260 W1zzard Reviews 44 07-07-2008 07:17 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:32 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts